Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
19 <br /> <br />iii. Motion finding there is or is not sufficient evidence in the record the <br />project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) of the UDO in that the use <br />is in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in <br />compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as <br />embodied in these regulations and in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />This motion is based on competent material and evidence entered into <br />the record of these proceedings, including: <br />NOTE – the following represents the findings of the Planning Board and <br />staff. If the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to <br />find compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) this list must be read <br />verbatim so it is in the record. <br />• Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application <br />and site plan, presented at the February 6, 2018 Public <br />Hearing. <br />• Staff testimony on the project and its compliance with various <br />provisions of the UDO. <br />• Applicant sworn testimony from the public hearing. <br />• Attachment 1 of the February 6, 2018 Public Hearing package <br />including the following: <br />o Detailed project narrative (pages 22 through 26) <br />o Phase 1 Environmental Assessment <br />demonstrating there are no environmental impacts <br />associated with the project (pages 27 through 99) <br />o Traffic impact analysis completed by Kimley Horn <br />(page 128) <br />o Site plan. <br />• Comments from the BOCC, Planning Board, and the general <br />public. <br />And <br />• A lack of competent material and substantial evidence <br />entered into the record demonstrating the project’s lack of <br />compliance with established standards. <br />If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br />the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c), the <br />Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br />absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the <br />claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) <br />(2) (c). <br /> <br />14. Motion to either approve or deny the Special Use Permit <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Burroughs to <br />approve the Special Use Permit. <br /> <br />John Roberts: You need to add to the motion to include language indicating the BOCC <br />imposes the recommended conditions as detailed within Attachment 4 of the <br />abstract package (pages 225-226). <br />