Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 121817
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
OCPB minutes 121817
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:33:33 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:20:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/18/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 121817
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 1/10/2018 <br /> <br />effort to uphold a vision of responsive governance and quality public services during our 56 <br />deliberations, decisions, and recommendations. 57 <br /> 58 <br /> 59 Public Charge 60 <br />The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its 61 <br />citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with 62 <br />fellow citizens. At any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this 63 <br />public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual 64 <br />regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting until 65 <br />such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. 66 <br /> 67 <br />Lydia Wegman read the public charge aloud. 68 <br /> 69 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS 70 <br />There were no comments. 71 <br /> 72 AGENDA ITEM 7: MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – SETTLER’S POINT - To review comments made at the 73 <br />November 14 quarterly public hearing, proposed revisions to conditions as a result of comments, and to make a 74 <br />recommendation on the proposed revisions concerning an application for an MPD-CZ (Master Plan Development 75 <br />Conditional Zoning). The proposed project encompasses approximately 195 acres in the Hillsborough Economic 76 <br />Development District (EDD) south of Interstate 40 on both sides of Old Highway 86. The public hearing for this item 77 <br />has been extended until January 23, 2018. Additional review of remaining aspects of the application and an 78 <br />additional recommendation by the Planning Board is scheduled for the January 10, 2018, Planning Board meeting. 79 <br />Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 80 81 <br />Michael Harvey directed the board to the abstract on Page 11. He reviewed that this item was heard at the November 13, 82 <br />2017, quarterly public hearing. It was referred back to the Planning Board for additional review because there were 83 <br />modifications to several conditions and there was additional information on the transportation impact analysis (TIA). It is not 84 <br />staff’s intention to ask the Planning Board to make a final vote this evening. Staff is asking for votes on direction. The Planning 85 <br />Board is not asked to provide a final decision at this meeting because additional discussion is expected on the Major 86 <br />Transportation Corridor (MTC) buffer in January. Staff is continuing to work with the applicant to address the comments made 87 <br />at the public hearing. He noted that the applicant is represented here this evening. 88 <br /> 89 <br />Michael Harvey reviewed that the transportation analysis addendum is located on Page 20. Staff comments begin on page 41. 90 <br />The summary of major questions/responses from the November public hearing starts on Page 62. General information about 91 <br />the Conditional Zoning District starts on Page 77. An excerpt of the October Planning Board minutes begins on Page 80. The 92 <br />November public hearing minutes start on Page 101. The revised conditions of approval start on Page 123. 93 <br /> 94 <br />Michael Harvey said he planned to walk the board through the revised conditions. 95 <br /> 96 <br />Kim Piracci asked for an explanation of the MTC buffer. Michael Harvey answered it’s a 100-foot buffer for all nonresidential 97 <br />development along major highways, so it applies along Interstate 40. A 50 percent break in the buffer is allowed but it is to be 98 <br />otherwise undisturbed. 99 <br /> 100 <br />Lydia Wegman requested that any images that would help explain the buffer be displayed. Michael Harvey shared an image 101 <br />provided by the applicant. 102 103 <br />Paul Guthrie asked if the interstate adjacent to this property has the standard 300-foot right of way and does the North 104 <br />Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) have control of it. Michael Harvey answered that to his knowledge it is under 105 <br />control of DOT and it is 300 feet wide. The buffer is obviously wider in areas that have off ramps. And it’s in control of the state 106 <br />through the federal government. 107 108 <br />Michael Harvey showed an image provided by the applicant that indicates where the100-foot buffer is to be located. He 109
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.