Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 100417
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
OCPB minutes 100417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:33:48 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/4/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 100417
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 11/01/2017 <br /> <br />17 <br />Kim Piracci said that she did not do her homework to study the materials for this development. She cannot make an 845 <br />informed decision on any of the items tonight. She said that she suspected that other members may be in a similar 846 <br />position. If she recommended that this item be tabled, the world would not come to an end. What is the worst that 847 <br />would happen? 848 <br /> 849 <br />Michael Harvey responded that if the decision is to table the entire project, it will be tabled and brought back up at the 850 <br />Board’s November regular meeting. With the delay, the project would not be going forward to public hearing in 851 <br />November because there will likely not be enough time to get it to the BOCC. He recommended that she ask Mr. 852 <br />Parker any questions. He also said that he would need direction on what Staff should provide in terms of more 853 <br />information or direction. 854 <br /> 855 <br />Kim Piracci said that she needs more time to study this project. She feels like this is too much to go forward with, for 856 <br />her personally. 857 <br /> 858 <br />Lydia Wegman said that she appreciated Ms. Piracci’s comments and gave Mr. Parker a chance to respond. She 859 <br />said that she would also like to know how other members feel, and wanted to give the public a chance to comment. 860 <br />The public has been extremely patient. 861 <br /> 862 <br />Jim Parker said that he understands Ms. Piracci’s position. He said that on his end, they are on a timeline and have a 863 <br />contractual obligation. Mr. Parker said that he does feel like the world would come to an end for he and his group. He 864 <br />wishes the project had been ready to move forward this past spring but here they are so much later. He said that he 865 <br />really hopes the Board approves the project. If anyone has questions, he will take as long as it takes to answer all of 866 <br />them. He thanked the Board. 867 <br /> 868 <br />Lydia Wegman turned to the public for their comments. She thanked them for being patient and asked people who 869 <br />wanted to speak to come forward to the microphone. 870 <br /> 871 <br />Beth Rosenberg said that she lives off Davis Road and she is in the same boat as Ms. Piracci. She did not know 872 <br />about this important meeting until she saw a sign. She did not find information about the project online. She wished 873 <br />that the developers had also met with property owners in the area at large since the interstate entrance/exit she uses 874 <br />to get home is the same entrance/exit as the proposed development. Her neighborhood will be impacted. She noted 875 <br />that already Old 86 can get busy with back-ups from the highway and more traffic on Interstate 40 is concerning. She 876 <br />is also concerned about environmental impacts of the project on her neighborhood. 877 <br /> 878 <br />Lydia Wegman thanked Ms. Rosenberg for her comments. She noted that the notification requirement is only to 879 <br />property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property/properties of the intended development. 880 <br /> 881 <br />Janet Marks said that she lives off of Davis Road in a small neighborhood. They chose their neighborhood because 882 <br />they could easily get to Interstates 40 and 85 but also live in the country. As a neighborhood, they have not been 883 <br />involved in the discussion. The signs on the side of the road notifying the public about these meetings were too hard 884 <br />to read and were put in places where it was too dangerous to pull-off the road and read them. She said that there is 885 <br />so much traffic already (for example, 4 dead squirrels on the road in one day). Both the heavy as well as the light 886 <br />environmental impacts all matter. Living in the country to her means that lights are dim. She conveyed her frustration 887 <br />in not being included in the neighborhood meeting process; her neighborhood is very much impacted by this 888 <br />proposed development. 889 <br /> 890 <br />Gerald Scarlett said that his driveway is Scarlett Mountain Road, the southern boundary of the subject property. His 891 <br />property goes about a half a mile back into the woods. While he came with a lot of questions tonight, he is not going 892 <br />to ask them because they involved District 3. One of his main concerns is with water. If the County is so concerned 893 <br />about “going green” and renewable energies, the point should be made that there are no renewables for water. He 894 <br />said that he lives at a high elevation and has a line of sight to the Sharon Harris Nuclear Power Plant when the skies 895 <br />are clear. The proposed development is at a lower level than his property. His well was made 250 feet down through 896 <br />solid granite. Even though the discussion has been about public water infrastructure, the development document 897
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.