Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 100417
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
OCPB minutes 100417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:33:48 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/4/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 100417
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 11/01/2017 <br /> <br />14 <br /> 686 <br />Tony Blake said that the streamlining is clear. He wants to make sure that the people affected by the project have 687 <br />been listened to. 688 <br /> 689 <br />Michael Harvey said that the applicant’s gone to great lengths to alleviate concerns, as has Staff, by making 690 <br />conditions of approval that address concerns. Mr. Harvey said that unfortunately, nothing is perfect. However, the 691 <br />application represents a reasonable move forward in this area of the County, and as Staff continues to address 692 <br />external roadway improvements, ancillary agencies will have more ability to compel some modifications of roadways 693 <br />that may impact certain components of projects. 694 <br /> 695 <br />Lydia Wegman acknowledged Paul Guthrie to speak. 696 <br /> 697 <br />Paul Guthrie asked a couple of questions: Has there been a formal analysis on the capacity with potential increases 698 <br />for water and sewer? And to what level? 699 <br /> 700 <br />Michael Harvey said that he will let the applicant answer that question. 701 <br /> 702 <br />Paul Guthrie asked - Who is going to pay for the expansion of the facilities if Hillsborough takes on the responsibility? 703 <br />Will the water supply be from Hillsborough? 704 <br /> 705 <br />Michael Harvey said that was not a question he could answer. 706 <br /> 707 <br />Paul Guthrie asked about a transmission line about a block-and-a-half from the site. Have there been discussions 708 <br />with the power company about this line? 709 <br /> 710 <br />Michael Harvey replied that no, there have not because no site plan has been submitted yet. While Staff knows there 711 <br />is service availability, it is currently unclear which use will be reviewed for approval first. It is incumbent upon the 712 <br />developer to make improvements on utilities for the good of the project, just like any developer in Orange County 713 <br />when it comes to utility upgrades. As site plans come-in, the Town of Hillsborough will decide if they can handle 714 <br />capacity, and if they cannot, the use cannot be approved. 715 <br /> 716 <br />Paul Guthrie asked if the developer will pay for additional costs associated with this. 717 <br /> 718 <br />Michael Harvey responded that if a developer wants utility upgrades for a project, they will have to pay for it. He 719 <br />cannot comment for the Town of Hillsborough. 720 <br /> 721 <br />Paul Guthrie noted that there has been an interesting dialogue going on with Hillsborough on this project, as he read 722 <br />in the materials provided. 723 <br /> 724 <br />Michael Harvey agreed and said that most of that dialogue is on District 3. Ms. Hauth’s letter voicing concern over the 725 <br />Town serving a residential project this far south, outside the Town’s corporate limits, is included in the materials given 726 <br />to the Board. These are the issues to discuss further. 727 <br /> 728 <br />Paul Guthrie said that Hillsborough will have to weigh capacity of water needs/use based on what gets built on the 729 <br />site. 730 <br /> 731 <br />Michael Harvey replied that applicants have to provide information for site plan review to figure out these very issues. 732 <br /> 733 <br />Craig Benedict said that in regards to water capacity for District 1, the agreement that the County has with 734 <br />Hillsborough does have a certain allocation – 108,000 gallons/day. This is part of the agreement in that area. Any 735 <br />uses that come forward will have to spread-out over the 148 acres or so to accommodate the capacity. For other 736 <br />issues outside of District 1, District 2, and possibly District 3, there will have to be an independent agreement 737 <br />between Hillsborough and the developer to negotiate water and sewer consumption. The County is involved with the 738
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.