Orange County NC Website
Approved 10/4/17 <br /> <br />2 <br /> 54 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS 55 <br /> 56 <br />Tony Blake commented on the quality of the minutes. He said that he was pleased to read that the airport was 57 <br />discussed at the last meeting and hoped that Staff’s recommendations are adopted. He also commented that he was 58 <br />glad that Laura Streitfeld provided comments to the Board. Mr. Blake said that he had been encouraging Ms. 59 <br />Streitfeld to attend the meeting and give her pitch. He hopes that the County Commissioners will read her comments. 60 <br /> 61 AGENDA ITEM 7: COMMITTEE/ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS 62 <br />a) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 63 b) ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION 64 65 <br />Michael Harvey said that there are no upcoming Board of Adjustment meetings. He also reported that there are 66 <br />several cases pending but no dates have been set. There are some applicants with unique challenges. 67 <br /> 68 <br />No report from the Orange Unified Transportation Board (OUT Board) 69 70 AGENDA ITEM 4. CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 71 72 <br />Randy Marshall asked if there was any new information on tire storage issues at Triangle Tire. 73 <br /> 74 <br />Michael Harvey answered that Staff sent out a Notice of Violation to Triangle Tire but he has not heard a response 75 <br />from the business at this time. This matter is being handled by Mr. Harvey’s division: Current Planning. 76 <br /> 77 <br />Randy Marshall said okay. He then talked about the situation in Houston with Hurricane Harvey and flooding where 78 <br />there is lots of concerns about the fact that developers built on top of wetlands, impacting the extent to the damage 79 <br />done there. He asked – Do we feel comfortable with the regulations we have in place in Orange County? Are 80 <br />wetlands are well-protected or do we look at this matter further down the line? 81 <br /> 82 <br />Tony Blake commented that he would defer to Michael Harvey to answer this question, but that it is his 83 <br />understanding that Orange County goes above and beyond what the state requires. 84 <br /> 85 <br />Randy Marshal replied that he would think that was the case. 86 <br /> 87 <br />Tony Blake said that the state has taken actions to override some of Orange County’s regulations. He deferred to Mr. 88 <br />Harvey for more information. 89 <br /> 90 <br />Michael Harvey said that he has no concerns as of this evening. He asked the Board to remember that the state is 91 <br />awaiting the results of a report on buffer requirements that could impact the County’s environmental management 92 <br />program significantly. He said that Orange County has a fairly aggressive and proactive buffer protection program on 93 <br />streams, wetlands, water features, and floodplain. It is conceivable, based on state action, that the County could lose 94 <br />buffers currently enforced on wetlands, water bodies and streams and would have to follow the state minimum 95 <br />model. Orange County does gets credit, especially when it comes to floodplain protection. Despite state action, Mr. 96 <br />Harvey plans to enforce federal law to protect the County’s floodplain buffers, and he doubts that the federal 97 <br />government would intercede. If Houston had respected its floodplain, it may not have had some of the issues it is 98 <br />having now. 99 <br /> 100 <br />Randy Marshall wondered about the development off Homestead and the nearby creek downstream from Hogan 101 <br />Farms. It seemed to him that the development was close to Bolin Creek. Does the County have any input into this 102 <br />area or is it Carrboro’s jurisdiction? 103 <br /> 104 <br />Michael Harvey said that he thought the area was in Carrboro’s jurisdiction. The Orange County Planning 105 <br />Department does not have regulatory authority of this area. However, the department may have been involved in joint 106