Orange County NC Website
APPROVED 8/2/17 <br /> <br />2 <br /> 54 AGENDA ITEM 5: PUBLIC CHARGE 55 56 <br />Introduction to the Public Charge 57 <br />The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General Statute, 58 <br />appoints the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB) to uphold the written land development 59 <br />laws of the County. The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and accomplish coordinated and 60 <br />harmonious development. OCPB shall do so in a manner, which considers the present and 61 <br />future needs of its citizens and businesses through efficient and responsive process that 62 <br />contributes to and promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the overall County. The OCPB 63 <br />will make every effort to uphold a vision of responsive governance and quality public services 64 <br />during our deliberations, decisions, and recommendations. 65 <br /> 66 PUBLIC CHARGE 67 <br />The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its 68 <br />citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with 69 <br />fellow citizens. At any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this 70 <br />public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual 71 <br />regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting 72 <br />until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. 73 <br /> 74 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS 75 <br /> 76 <br />No comments from Chair or Vice Chair 77 <br /> 78 <br />AGENDA ITEM 7: COMMITTEE/ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS 79 a) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 80 b) ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION 81 82 <br />Michael Harvey reported that the Board of Adjustment was slated to review a Class B Special Use Permit last month 83 <br />proposing a kennel off of North Carolina Highway 86, just north of Whitfield Road. However, the application has been 84 <br />put on hold at the direct request of the applicant. The applicant has not yet secured all of the appropriate approvals 85 <br />from the Environmental Health Department (hereafter referred to as the “Health Department”) for the proposed septic 86 <br />system; the application is facing a negative recommendation by the Staff at this time. The applicant is working with 87 <br />the Health Department to fix septic issues. There is not an estimated timeframe for the application to be heard at this 88 <br />juncture. 89 <br /> 90 <br />No report from the Orange Unified Transportation Board (OUT Board) 91 92 AGENDA ITEM 4. CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 93 94 <br />Tony Blake reviewed an addition to the agenda from Craig Benedict: an email (referred to hereafter as “the letter”) to 95 <br />Craig, Michael Harvey and Donna Baker from Randy Marshall, Planning Board member, regarding scrap tires, stale 96 <br />water, and mosquitos, and whether or not there is a spraying program. Tony Blake said that his first take on the 97 <br />matter is that it is a Health Department issue or a Solid Waste issue. He also does not think that Orange County is 98 <br />the only place with this problem. 99 <br /> 100 <br />Note: See original email in attachments for this meeting 101 <br />Craig Benedict said that while the letter raises points not directly related to land use, per se, the Health Department, 102 <br />in the past, has worked with Planning as part of a combined effort, to handle an issue such as this that is discovered 103 <br />during code enforcement activities. A lot of it, under County jurisdiction, is not as specific as what cities can do. Cities 104 <br />can have what they call ‘nuisance ordinances’ where they say someone’s grass is too high or there is too much in 105 <br />someone’s yard or something like that. He said that Planning cannot go to that level, but Planning Staff will make an 106