OCPB minutes 101716 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 11/2/16 3 we’ve had titles in there before like Light Manufacturing and they said, “What’s that?” so now there will probably be 108 50 listings of what that means. But we can have it as a document that can be put all together and will be part of the 109 code. The specificity, although it adds 40 pages or so, is going to be helpful. And let’s say there is a use that we 110 want to pop back in there; we have to be flexible enough to be able to do that. This was part of the Commissioners 111 request from the September meeting, to develop consistency across the EDDs. 112 113 Lisa Stuckey: I have one little question. Wasn’t one of the concerns the asphalt plant? Is that covered with coal 114 product? 115 116 Perdita Holtz: Yes. It is. It’s like cement and concrete. It’s listed as a subcategory to that main category. 117 118 Lisa Stuckey: Ok. I thought it was probably petroleum. 119 120 Kim Piracci: What do these all have in common? 121 122 Lisa Stuckey: Noxious. 123 124 Kim Piracci: The animal food manufacturing is noxious? 125 126 Perdita Holtz: When we looked at the sub sector 311 food manufacturing and there are nine different uses under 127 there and animal food manufacturing is one of them. Grain, sugar and confectionary product, vegetable and fruit 128 preserving, specialty food manufacturing, dairy product manufacturing, animal slaughtering and processing, seafood 129 product preparation and packaging, bakeries and tortilla manufacturing and other food manufacturing are the nine 130 subcategories and most of those would be allowed. Animal food manufacturing we would take out because they do 131 tend to have smells associated with them. 132 133 Craig Benedict: And the other similarity… We have performance standards for a lot of uses that were permitted by 134 right. Fumes, vibration, dust, noise, and light. So you’ll see a lot of similarities here that could be some sort of odor or 135 fumes and we didn’t have them specifically prohibited and now we’re being more specific. 136 137 Tony Blake: Curtis Bane had a question, I believe. 138 139 Curtis Bane: What’s the impact fee going to be on these businesses? 140 141 Perdita Holtz: What kind of impact fee? 142 143 Curtis Bane: There’s not going to be an impact fee for these? 144 145 Perdita Holtz: Orange County charges school impact fees but only new residential construction pays school impact 146 fees because residential is what causes school impacts. 147 148 Craig Benedict: So there’ll be no impact fees on any non-residential uses in the County. 149 150 Curtis Bane: What about buffer zoning? 151 152 Craig Benedict: Buffers on streams? 153 154 Curtis Bane: In between properties, on streams next to the residential. 155 156 Perdita Holtz: They all still apply. 157 158 Tony Blake: And these restrictions would not apply to farms, right? 159 160