Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 040616
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
OCPB minutes 040616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:37:26 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:11:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/6/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 040616
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 5/4/16 <br />7 <br />Tony Blake: The one I was interested in was Orange Grove Road cutting through to 70, and that would take some of 320 <br />the pressure off Churton street in downtown Hillsborough. 321 <br /> 322 <br />Craig Benedict: We’re interested in the development that Hillsborough recently approved, Collin’s Ridge, a thousand 323 <br />units that would be using that as the primary access point because that’s the only… And they have to get additional 324 <br />right of way for that. We’re trying to see if some contributions by the developer could accelerate that road. 325 <br /> 326 <br />Paul Guthrie: Is the state still listing the train station… 327 <br /> 328 <br />Craig Benedict: Yes, it’s still on schedule. It’s not 2017, I think it’s 2019… That’s an important link and if we can 329 <br />leverage all the money together it could accelerate that project. The developer of Colin’s Ridge was going to make 8 330 <br />improvements on Churton by 2018 and 2022 Churton Street was going to be widened by DOT in 2023. And so our 331 <br />recommendations from the county were, why don’t you take the money from the developer, give it to DOT and have 332 <br />them bring the whole project forward instead of .. And reconstruction and the waste of those 8 improvements… And 333 <br />we have a new finding that could make this even more feasible. They actually want to bend/change the curvature in 334 <br />that area and so what they could do is while they’re building the new curvature which is shorter they can build the 335 <br />tunnel before they build the track on top of it which is a lot cheaper and it doesn’t make the rail paranoid that you’re 336 <br />tunneling underneath it in active traffic. That’s something that we just got recently. 337 <br /> 338 <br />Tony Blake: So one more question… I was reading today and I went to that meeting with the Chamber of Commerce 339 <br />in Chapel Hill and there was some talk about this, they used to call it the EDGE… And so is there any movement 340 <br />there in that joint planning area or is that still… 341 <br /> 342 <br />Craig Benedict: It’s Chapel Hill’s decision… They changed. It was JPA but last year they turned to… They asked for 343 <br />comments from Orange County on that but the master plan developed had this wide range of approvals from 30% 344 <br />residential to 70% residential so the impacts for that wide range is quite a difference so we said 30% residential and 345 <br />70% non-residential tax base. It probably would be a good balance sheet for County purposes. 346 <br />AGENDA ITEM 9: ADJOURNMENT 347 <br /> 348 <br />Motion to adjourn made by Lisa Stuckey. 349 <br /> <br />___________________________________________ <br />Lydia Wegman, Chair <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.