OCPB minutes 010616 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

5 should be a broader outreach meeting beyond 1,000 feet. So that can occur, especially when it’s government 214 initiated. 215 216 Tony Blake: Yeah, the SUP case I was thinking of is the guy who builds the subdivision with 10 or 15 houses and a 217 runway and everybody’s got their own little hangar; is that a public airport? Is that a private airport? And then if it’s a 218 SUP and you only have to notify people within 1,000 feet that landing and taking off could extend quite a bit beyond 219 there. That’s the just of my concern. 220 221 Lydia Wegman: Okay, great, thank you. 222 223 Patricia Roberts: Is there any airport planned? 224 225 Craig Benedict: No, there are no airports planned. We are in the process of updating our airport regulations. Some of 226 our outreach meetings were occurring around the holidays so it was decided to move it to a less busy time to 227 evaluate the new regulations. The best time to update your regulations is when there are no proposals out there. So 228 we will begin again, we’re going to speak with the commissioners in a work session about the process and the 229 parameters of some of the updates and it probably will not come back until later this year. 230 231 Lisa Stuckey: I think all the schools I dealt with were in the cities of Chapel Hill or Carrboro, their jurisdictions. But 232 typically, we went way beyond 1,000 feet and there was a community meeting and there was a lot of use of various 233 media to get the word out because you don’t want to build a big thing like that and then have all these people angry 234 later. So you know what to incorporate. 235 236 Tony Blake: Yeah, and it may be something that’s already been considered and non-issue. I just couldn’t find it 237 anywhere and I couldn’t find anywhere where this could be superseded by a SUP. 238 239 Lydia Wegman: And the school would be a governmental use, wouldn’t it? 240 241 Perdita Holtz: Schools actually come under a different section, but there’s outreach you have to do. 242 243 244 AGENDA ITEM 9: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENT - To make a 245 recommendation to the BOCC on government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO 246 regarding temporary healthcare structures and other custodial care housing options. This 247 item is scheduled for the February 18, 2016 quarterly public hearing. 248 249 PRESENTER: Ashley Moncado, Special Projects Planner 250 251 Ashley Moncado reviewed abstract 252 253 Patricia Roberts: I was having kind of a hard time visualizing what this would look like. Does anybody have an 254 example? 255 256 Ashley Moncado: At one point we did have a little flyer, unfortunately it’s not included in your packet tonight. It’s a 257 mobile unit, so if you can picture a single wide manufactured home, even smaller than that. A temporary health care 258 structure originally is only about 300 square feet. It’s a mobile unit so it’s basically a room with a bathroom. It can go 259 on any lot where an existing single family home would be permitted. Your only issue with neighborhoods, they are 260 permitted at the county level, but if there’s covenants or restrictions then they trump the Session Law. 261 262 Patricia Roberts: I see 1,000 square feet everywhere here except for the table, on the table it said it can’t exceed 300 263 square feet. 264 265 Ashley Moncado: I think that is just referencing a temporary health care structure, which this is something from a 266 previous meeting where they wanted to know what other options there are out there for providing care to family 267