Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 100715
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
OCPB minutes 100715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:39:02 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:07:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 100715
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2015
OCPB agenda 100715-2
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 11/4/15 <br /> <br />7 <br />Michael Harvey: We have a standard in here that stipulates a discharged shell be directed into a backstop which 317 <br />would consist of concrete, steel, wood, or combination. The concern is can any consideration be given to a property 318 <br />owner who locates a shooting area in low lying area and takes advantage of topography to reduce to scope of 319 <br />backstop. Since topography can be altered I am worried about relying on that as a means of guaranteeing a 320 <br />reasonable backstop. 321 <br /> 322 <br />Herman Staats: I have a shooting range on my property with an earth backstop. The shooting range I have built on 323 <br />my property does not meet the definition of suitable. I believe it is safe and I think some consideration should be 324 <br />given to these other factors despite my own personal range. The other issue I have is that concrete and steel are not 325 <br />ideal for a backstop if you have ricochet issues and there needs to be some consideration for that as well. Lastly, this 326 <br />broadly specifies shooting activities and does not address shooting clay pigeons in the air. 327 <br /> 328 <br />Tony Blake: I agree. Steel is very dangerous. 329 <br /> 330 <br />Michael Harvey: What I am hearing from comments is if we could reconfigure the back stop standards and provide 331 <br />distinction for skeet shooting? 332 <br /> 333 <br />Buddy Hartley: I think the earth backstop is obviously your best option. 334 <br /> 335 <br />Tony Blake: The Sherriff’s letter seems to indicate that he has standards for backstops and for safe shooting and I 336 <br />was wondering if it would be a good idea to coordinate with the Sheriff’s Department. 337 <br /> 338 <br />Michael Harvey: The Sheriff does not have ordinance for stablishing regulations for a backstop. What they do is go 339 <br />out and make a determination if the activity is safe, but they do not have specific standards. The Sherriff has 340 <br />reviewed this. Also I would like to remind the Board the proposed text amendment indicates target shooting activities 341 <br />are governed by the Ordinance. I would interpret that to mean skeet shooting as well. 342 <br /> 343 <br />Lisa Stuckey: Are there any state laws on this? 344 <br /> 345 <br />Michael Harvey: There are state laws, but they do not get specific to the construction of a backstop. There is 346 <br />nebulous language in the general statutes, but not definite state law regulating the backstop. 347 <br /> 348 <br />Paul Guthrie: Are there any considerations on what type of weapons are being fired? 349 <br /> 350 <br />Michael Harvey: No. From a land use stand point we do not have the legal authority to tell people they cannot shoot a 351 <br />certain weapon. 352 <br /> 353 <br />Herman Staats: This language on page 123 is the distinction of the times per month for shooting? 354 <br /> 355 <br />Michael Harvey: Yes on page 123 we added language with the direction of the County Attorney indicating that if you 356 <br />are a property owner and are discharging your gun on your property three days or less a month that is not going to 357 <br />be considered an activity that warrants you to build a backstop. 358 <br /> 359 <br />Lydia Wegman: For clarification, someone could go out on their property three times a month and target shoot all day 360 <br />long? 361 <br /> 362 <br />Michael Harvey: Unfortunately, that is exactly what that means. 363 <br /> 364 <br />James Lea: And not only can they target shoot, but they can shoot any gun they want? 365 <br /> 366 <br />Michael Harvey: They can shoot any gun they want anyway, period. 367 <br /> 368 <br />Lydia Wegman: Does this exemption also exempt them from the hours of the day. 369
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.