OCPB minutes 060315 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 7/1/2015 3 it but my thought process is that if the address is off that road indicate the point of entry for those lots, it will 100 remain on the GIS system. 101 102 Pete Hallenbeck: They are currently switching to a system of closely dispatch that looks for all possible 103 roads and routes and there is no mechanism to show if the road is full access or not. 104 105 Michael Harvey: You will probably see that occur if the project is approved and recorded. This will remain 106 as an easement (Mr. Harvey was pointing to a map of the identified easement area) but the road name will 107 be removed. 108 109 Paul Guthrie: On the open space buffering outside the lot, what is going to be the legal long -term 110 ownership and legal responsibility for that property? 111 112 Tom Heffner: It would be owned by a homeowner’s association as incorporated body. Their legal 113 documents would require their ownership and their maintenance of the property and then in turn there 114 would be homeowner’s dues paid by the people living in the subdivision that would fund that work on an 115 ongoing basis. 116 117 Michael Harvey: If this is approved with a flexible development layout, there will be provisions in the 118 resolution of approval as there are in all major subdivision based on the flexibility and design guidelines to 119 preclude the clearing of the trees within the dedicated open space except for any activity recognized by the 120 board such as the installation of a trial or recreation area. 121 122 Paul Guthrie: My question was about long term liability and things that take place on that and the ability or 123 not of that being removed from open space. 124 125 Michael Harvey: This area could not be removed from open space unless the applicant came back to the 126 county to request a modification of the major subdivision. I will state that we would probably object to it 127 being removed because that is how it was originally approved and we are not interested in seeing 128 dedicated open space turned into developed area. 129 130 James Lea: Does Lot 9 actually take up part of the pond? 131 132 Tom Heffner: Yes. The pond size will be modified. Since it is not a spring fed pond, in the summer when 133 we have less rain, it drops significantly so my goal is that we will reduce the physical area of the pond to try 134 to have a more stable water level. The line is showing the maximum size of the pond. 135 136 James Lea: What happens when you have flooding with the pond? 137 138 Tom Heffner: Earth Centric engineering is doing storm water plan we have had several meetings on how to 139 handle that. We can increase the storm water flow downstream to the properties over to the right. We are 140 trying to utilize the pond as a storm water retention device so in maximum flow areas, the pond will serve to 141 retain storm water so it will be release more gradually after the storm event is over. 142 143 Pete Hallenbeck: It looks like the drainage to the pond is out the center. Is that through a drain pipe? 144 145 Tom Heffner: I don’t know. 146 147 Pete Hallenbeck: If it is, you should still have a cut away for hurricane events. 148