Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 060315
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
OCPB minutes 060315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:40:07 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:05:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 060315
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From:Tony <br />To:Perdita Holtz ; "Andrea Rohrbacher"; "Bryant Warren "; "Buddy Hartley"; Deputy Chief Pete Hallenbeck; <br />"Herman Staats"; "James Lea "; "Laura Nicholson"; "Lisa Stuckey"; "Lydia Wegman"; "Maxecine Mitchell"; "Paul <br />Guthrie" <br />Cc:Erica L. Gray ; Debra Graham; Craig Benedict; Michael Harvey; Ashley E. Moncado <br />Subject:RE: Additional Item for July 1 Planning Board Meeting <br />Date:Monday, June 29, 2015 6:53:41 PM <br />Not sure this came through in the minutes. While I tend to agree with the UDO amendment <br />relieving slightly the regulation on impervious surface, I think the case used to make the impervious <br />surface change was not a defect in the UDO, but a problem of disclosure on the part of the <br />developer and a legitimate oversight on the part of the real estate agent. <br /> <br />I argue that changing the UDO alone addresses the symptom, but does not address the root cause <br />of the issue. I argue further that real estate agents and buyers must be alerted if/when the <br />impervious surface limit on a subdivided piece of property under development falls below a certain <br />ratio. Since it is up to the developer to parcel that restriction the burden of disclosure is on the <br />developer. <br /> <br />-Tony <br /> <br />From: Perdita Holtz [mailto:pholtz@orangecountync.gov] <br />Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:13 PM <br />To: Andrea Rohrbacher; Bryant Warren ; Buddy Hartley; Deputy Chief Pete Hallenbeck; Herman Staats; <br />James Lea ; Laura Nicholson; Lisa Stuckey; Lydia Wegman; Maxecine Mitchell; Paul Guthrie; Tony Blake <br />Cc: Erica L. Gray; Debra Graham; Craig Benedict; Michael Harvey; Ashley E. Moncado <br />Subject: Additional Item for July 1 Planning Board Meeting <br /> <br />Hello Planning Board Members, <br /> <br />We discovered that we need to add an additional item to the Planning Board agenda: Approval of <br />April 1, 2015 ORC Summary Notes. The file with the notes is attached for your use and information. <br /> <br />Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. <br /> <br />Perdita Holtz, AICP <br />Planning Systems Coordinator <br />Orange County (NC) Planning Department <br />P.O. Box 8181 (mailing) <br />131 W. Margaret Lane, 2nd floor (physical) <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Phone: 919.245.2578 <br />pholtz@orangecountync.gov <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.