Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 060315
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
OCPB minutes 060315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:40:07 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:05:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 060315
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 7/1/2015 <br />15 <br />Laura Nicholson: it also says affordable housing earlier in that. 687 <br /> 688 <br />Lydia Wegman: I don’t think it’s consistent so ia m going to vote No. 689 <br /> 690 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: The comprehensive plan and the UDO are often in conflict with each other. 691 <br /> 692 <br />Lydia Wegman: I know that. 693 <br /> 694 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: We want affordable housing and we want sidewalks. 695 <br /> 696 <br />Lydia Wegman: I realize that I will just note this requirement to vote on consistency is an empty 697 <br />requirement because as you say Pete, there’s always a lot of inconsistent things in the comprehensive plan 698 <br />and you could find something to support almost any position in the plan. 699 <br /> 700 <br />Paul Guthrie: Are you going to call the vote. 701 <br /> 702 <br />Vote 10 to 2 (Paul Guthrie/Lydia Wegman*) 703 <br /> 704 <br />Paul Guthrie: I didn’t like it. 705 <br /> 706 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Motion to approve the amendment as in the packet UDO amendments. 707 <br /> 708 <br />James Lea: What page is that on? 709 <br /> 710 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: 73 attachement 3. 711 <br /> 712 <br />Motion by Buddy Hartley. Seconded by Bryant Warren. 713 <br /> 714 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: This is the section in red we discussed where it says the submittal requirements and so 715 <br />forth. This document is very much driven by the state law. 716 <br /> 717 <br />Ashley Moncado: Yes 718 <br /> 719 <br />Vote: 9 to 3 (Lydia Wegman, Lisa Stuckey and Paul Guthrie) 720 <br /> 721 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Paul would you like to say anything. 722 <br /> 723 <br />Paul Guthrie: Bad law, we can deal with the issue without it. 724 <br /> 725 <br />Lisa Stuckey: I’m voting no simply because I don’t think we have all the facts. This is something worth 726 <br />asking the attorney whether it could be made less restrictive to include nonrelatives to be in compliance 727 <br />with other areas of our UDO to allow husband and wife to be in there together so I just feel like I would 728 <br />rather let the attorney guide us, something for county commissioners to ask the attorney. 729 <br /> 730 <br />Lydia Wegman: I agree with Lisa. I’m concerned about approving just this piece without having the other 731 <br />pieces. We’ve talked about going forward with it so it’s clear that we are presenting a whole package of 732 <br />options to people who are facing this situation. We may need to follow up on Lisa’s suggestion and we 733 <br />many need to approve this but I would like to see if there is a way at the same time to approve something 734 <br />that is broader and meets the needs of many more people in the county. 735
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.