OCPB minutes 060315 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 7/1/2015 14 638 Lydia Wegman: Added to the long list already 639 640 Lisa Stuckey: You could do a completely identical parallel amendment to the code and just change the 641 things we like. We could have 2 of them sitting there. 642 643 Pete Hallenbeck: I’ll remind everybody that we have this dinner with the commissioners every year and 644 that’s an opportunity to say here are areas that we think would be interesting to look at this might be a very 645 good thing to look at and now you’re going to go through the right process instead of tweaking it and if this 646 goes away, we could still have our solution. 647 648 Laura Nicholson: I withdraw my amendment request however this is a solution without a problem. It’s a 649 unaffordable ridiculous thing but I am all for complying with state regulations. 650 651 Tony: 1 question for Mike, this temporary structure does this count against your impervious surface? 652 653 Michael Harvey: Everything counts against your impervious surface if it meets the definition. 654 655 Paul Guthrie: Between the septic laws and the impervious surface, I think there can be lots of decisions 656 made on the process. 657 658 Lydia Wegman: Craig & Michael you mentioned co -housing and it sounds like some discussion is going on, 659 is that something this could incude addressing this problem that we’re talking about? 660 661 Craig Benedict: Yes. I think this could go true we have new initiatives about affordable housing about small 662 housing but we’ve been trying to describe these new hou sing opportunities out there. Are they mobile 663 homes, are they RVs, are they micro houses, we will be presenting to the commissioners probably in 664 September of this year. These other type of housing options would address bringing the parents back in the 665 house. We’re into that process, we would expect getting a green light to address some of those issues in 666 September or October and bringing forward later this year. 667 668 Lydia Wegman: And would that kind of thing come to the planning board fi the commissioners said go? 669 670 Craig Benedict: Yes, definitely. 671 672 Lydia Wegman: Thank you. 673 674 Pete Hallenbeck: We have a statement of consistency to vote on and it says this isn’t against what’s in the 675 comprehensive plan. It addresses a .25% improvement on that plan. We’ll need a mot ion to vote on that 676 and then vote on the specific amendment items here. We’ll make a recommendation to the BOCC on the 677 statement of consistency that yes we think it is consistent. 678 679 MOTION made by: Buddy Hartley. Seconded by: Bryant Warren 680 681 Lydia Wegman: Housing goal #2 – Housing that is useable by as many people as possible regardless of 682 age, ability or circumstances but this is only useable by one person 683 684 Tony Blake: 1 income 685 686