Browse
Search
OCPB minutes 120314
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
OCPB minutes 120314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:41:30 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 5:03:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB agenda 120314
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2/4/15 <br />6 <br />Paul Guthrie: It seems to me that if this process will work at all, this Board may have a bigger responsibility because 270 <br />we have one shot to raise the critical questions that need to be considered in the decisions and that doesn’t happen 271 <br />in the joint session now where we sit there and listen to something until 11 o’clock at night and then by the time it’s 272 <br />over we can’t even remember what the questions are that you really think need to be considered. I think we have an 273 <br />obligation if this becomes practice to think through how we communicate through staff to the Board of County 274 <br />Commissioners on issues that need to be dealt with by the Commissioners at the time of testimony. The Boards that 275 <br />I have seen operate in this County only occasionally rise to that level. The staff rises to it but I’m not sure the boards 276 <br />do and we need to think about that as a Board. 277 <br /> 278 <br />Perdita Holtz: Probably what will happen is that the Planning Board minutes will become part of that public hearing 279 <br />packet. 280 <br /> 281 <br />Craig Benedict: We would accent anything different that occurred in the application from the original material. We do 282 <br />accent any new information, any change in information that has occurred from the original application and evidentiary 283 <br />material that comes forward. 284 <br /> 285 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Ok, so the action for tonight is? 286 <br /> 287 <br />Perdita Holtz: Is there consensus that this flowchart captured the quasi-judicial discussion. 288 <br /> 289 <br />MOTION by Paul Guthrie that the flowchart captured the Planning Board discussion of the quasi-judicial process. 290 <br />Seconded by Buddy Hartley. 291 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 292 <br /> 293 <br />Lydia Wegman: Let me clarify. I am voting to say the flowchart captures what we’ve talked about, I am not saying I 294 <br />agree with it just to be clear. 295 <br /> 296 297 AGENDA ITEM 9: COMMITTEE/ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS: 298 <br />a. Board of Adjustment 299 <br /> 300 <br /> 301 AGENDA ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT: 302 303 MOTION by Bryant Warren to adjourn. Seconded by Tony Blake. 304 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 305 ___________________________________________ <br /> Pete Hallenbeck, Chair
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.