OCPB minutes 060513 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 7/10/13 2 55 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS 56 57 Pete Hallenbeck: You have the list of Areas of Interest and things to make emergency services better and comments 58 on home occupation. I have those in there so you can see the level of detail. You can look at the UDO and see how 59 the ordinances are written. On July 10, we will have a brief presentation on home businesses. By August we should 60 be at a position to discussion home occupation. 61 62 Lisa Stuckey: I was on the Chapel Hill Home occupation committee years ago and it is a pretty good one. Can we 63 include that in the packet? 64 65 Tina Love: I can include that in the packet. 66 67 Pete Hallenbeck: At the Quarterly Public Hearing there was talk about a way to speed up this process. Perhaps we 68 can ask Michael to come in at 6:30 to go over this whole process for planning board and permitting and UDO changes 69 so we will know what that process is. 70 71 72 Agenda Item 7: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT – To make a recommendation to the BOCC on a property owner-73 initiated amendment to the Zoning Atlas to rezone a 3.36 acre parcel of property along US 74 Highway 70 (PIN 9803-81-7503) from EDE-1 (Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity) to 75 EDE-2 (Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity). This item was heard at the May 28, 2013 76 quarterly public hearing. 77 Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 78 79 Michael Harvey: Reviewed abstract. 80 81 Pete Hallenbeck: The EDE-1 to the south of that property, the expectation is it would stay EDE-1. 82 83 Michael Harvey: Action on this item will not have any impact on the zoning of the southern property. Even if the zoning 84 of the Baldwin property is changed to EDE-2, the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance requires a 100 foot 85 perimeter buffer for all EDD zoned properties. Regardless of the zoning of the Baldwin property the 100 foot buffer will 86 still apply. 87 88 Pete Hallenbeck: The 100 foot buffer is only in the transition from EDD to something else, it is not EDE adjacent to 89 each other? 90 91 Michael Harvey: I am referring to the 100 foot perimeter buffer that has to surround the EDD zoned areas of the 92 County. The rezoning of this property will not impact or reduce this perimeter buffer requirement in any way. Let’s 93 assume this parcel to the south of the Baldwin property were rezoned to Rural Residential. This would mean the 94 perimeter buffer would be imposed on the properties to the north. The rezoning of the Baldwin property from EDE-1 to 95 EDE-2 however will not impact this requirement. Also bear in mind there are different land use buffers required for 96 different land uses. EDD properties adjacent to one another have to have some form of land use buffer based on what 97 is proposed to be developed. 98 99 MOTION made by Lisa Stuckey to accept staff’s recommendation and recommend approval to the Board of County 100 Commissioners. 101 102 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 103 104 105 Agenda Item 8: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS – To make a 106 recommendation to the BOCC on government-initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan 107 Future Land Use Map and Zoning Atlas to assign land use category classifications and to 108