Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 020718
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
OCPB agenda 020718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 2:02:06 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 4:22:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/7/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 020718
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEM 6: PUBLIC CHARGE 56 57 Introduction to the Public Charge 58 <br />The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General Statute, 59 <br />appoints the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB) to uphold the written land development laws 60 <br />of the County. The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and accomplish coordinated and 61 <br />harmonious development. OCPB shall do so in a manner, which considers the present and future 62 <br />needs of its citizens and businesses through efficient and responsive process that contributes to 63 <br />and promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the overall County. The OCPB will make every 64 <br />effort to uphold a vision of responsive governance and quality public services during our 65 <br />deliberations, decisions, and recommendations. 66 <br /> 67 <br /> 68 Public Charge 69 <br />The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its 70 <br />citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with 71 <br />fellow citizens. At any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this 72 <br />public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual 73 <br />regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting until 74 <br />such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. 75 <br /> 76 <br />Lydia Wegman read the public charge aloud. 77 <br /> 78 AGENDA ITEM 7: CHAIR COMMENTS 79 <br />There were no comments. 80 <br /> 81 AGENDA ITEM 8: CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP) - To review and make a recommendation to the BOCC on a 82 <br />Class A Special Use Permit application to develop a solar array/public utility station on 27.8 acres of a 52 acre parcel 83 <br />of property (PIN 9835-02-9137, no address assigned yet) which is accessed via an easement from 6519 U.S. 84 <br />Highway 70 West within the Cheeks Township. An SUP was approved in September 2016 but has expired, 85 <br />necessitating consideration of a new SUP. 86 Presenter: Patrick Mallett, Planner II 87 <br /> 88 <br />Patrick Mallett summarized that this application was previously reviewed by the Planning Board at its August 3, 2016, 89 <br />regular meeting and approved by the BOCC on September 12, 2016. This approval expired on September 12, 2017, 90 <br />and therefore needs to be re-approved. This is a solar array third party company that transfers its power to Duke 91 <br />Energy. He reviewed the site plan. There is 20 to 30 feet of elevation change as well as distance between this 92 <br />property and residential neighbors. 93 <br /> 94 <br />Lydia Wegman asked about the distance from residential land. 95 <br /> 96 <br />Patrick Mallett answered mostly more than 1,000 feet. He continued to review the site plan, including the location of 97 <br />the access easement, the screening and buffer of the solar array area. He pointed out stream buffers along the 98 <br />perimeters of the property. Previously, there was a condition to preserve a conservation easement in a corner of the 99 <br />property. Staff has determined that it the conservation easement was cumbersome with legalities and instead 100 <br />proposed to call that corner a natural buffer area. 101 <br /> 102 <br />Lydia Wegman asked if that change will be reflected in the lease agreement. 103 <br /> 104 <br />Patrick Mallett said the plat would lock that in as a commitment that they will not disturb that corner. The stream 105 <br />buffers would not permit the owner to do much anyway, he added. 106 <br /> 107 <br />Brian Quintan added that when it is recorded for the lease, it will be written that this area cannot be disturbed. 108 <br /> 109 <br />Tony Blake noted it is only good as long as the lease is in effect. Brian Quintan confirmed that. 110 <br /> 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.