Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 011018
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
OCPB agenda 011018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 2:01:51 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 4:10:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/10/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB Minutes 011018
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
David Blankfard asked for clarification about the lights, that it would be located at the exit. Michael Harvey said it was 331 <br />supposed to be installed with Waterstone but they would be doing it as part of this project. 332 <br /> 333 <br />Michael Harvey reviewed where there would be an installation of a left turn lane on Service Road and on Old 334 <br />Highway 86. 335 <br /> 336 <br />Michael Harvey then showed the 2022 buildout map. There would be two lanes of through traffic on Old Highway 86. 337 <br />There would be a stoplight wherever the access to District 2 is built. He noted Davis Road remains unimproved. He 338 <br />said two individuals raised concern that Davis Road would become a five-lane road. In his 13 years, he’s not seen 339 <br />that plan. 340 <br /> 341 <br />Michael Harvey said Ed Sirgeny with Summit Engineering is present to answer questions. Michael Harvey said 342 <br />District 1 is meant to be served by Service Road. Staff would like the developer to work on having another access. 343 <br />Staff also needs additional time to review some of Jim Parker’s comments on the TIA. 344 <br /> 345 <br />Tony Blake asked about a super street. Michael Harvey answered I’m not going to say it’s totally abandoned because 346 <br />it may have to happen. The developer has done its best to show we’re not going to get to the point to compel Service 347 <br />Road to have to right turn and U-turn. Tony Blake said the concern was how to make a U-turn with a tractor trailer. 348 <br /> 349 <br />Craig Benedict said a memo was received the day of the public hearing from DOT saying there was no need for a U-350 <br />turn. Now they’re saying you can have 900,000 square feet of warehousing or equivalent. After that would be the 351 <br />trigger point in District 1 of having to come up with another connection farther to the south. It still allows the left turn 352 <br />movement for a long period of time. Service Road was created when I-40 was built. DOT put it where they thought it 353 <br />could be signalized. Now they want more space between a signal and the interstate ramp. That much can be built 354 <br />without the need for the U-turn. 355 <br /> 356 <br />Michael Harvey said the applicant was required by staff to provide the breakdown, which he shared. It included land 357 <br />use, size, units, adjacent street traffic volumes weekday morning and afternoon peak hours. 358 <br /> 359 <br />Jim Parker said Tony Blake, if your question is if other accesses have been explored beside Service Road, yes. 360 <br /> 361 <br />Tony Blake asked if anyone has approached DOT about combining the exit ramp and Service Road. Jim Parker 362 <br />answered no, DOT used to do that but they don’t like that anymore. We understand there is a limit to this working 363 <br />fluidly. Level of service is going to dictate the service road functioning. DOT is not going to allow level of service to 364 <br />decline beyond a certain point. We will continue to try to look for alternatives to make the whole thing work. 365 <br /> 366 <br />Tony Blake said with this zoning, it doesn’t come back before the Planning Board or Orange County Board of 367 <br />Commissioners so I want to make sure we hash it out as much as we can. 368 <br /> 369 <br />Michael Harvey said that’s not quite accurate. Right now there is access from Service Road. Any access to Old 370 <br />Highway 86 would come back for a modification. If Jim Parker and his cohorts can find a way to get an alternative 371 <br />access, there is going to be tweaking of the application. Every site plan application has to have a TIA. This 372 <br />assessment is required in Orange County when the traffic trips is expected to exceed 800 trips a day but for this 373 <br />project it is for every project regardless of the expected trips per day. 374 <br /> 375 <br />Tony Blake spoke in favor of aligning the access along the power easement. Jim Parker said we have looked at a lot 376 <br />of options. At this point, none of them are 100 percent viable. 377 <br /> 378 <br />Kim Piracci said I’m assuming that if traffic circles were appropriate, you would consider that. 379 <br /> 380 <br />Michael Harvey said any viable traffic alternative would be studied but may not be appropriate here because tractor 381 <br />trailers would be using this road. Traffic circles aren’t a bad thing but it’s not as viable here as in other locations in 382 <br />Orange County. 383 <br /> 384 <br />Michael Harvey asked for other comments on the TIA. He said it sounds like the board is comfortable with the revised 385 <br /> 265
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.