Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 100417
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
OCPB agenda 100417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 3:55:46 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 3:40:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/4/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 100417
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5 <br />Kim Piracci said that she is dumbfounded that there can be motor vehicles allowed in public drinking water supply. 216 <br /> 217 <br />Tony Blake said that large amounts of antidepressants have been found in the brains of fish in the Great Lakes. 218 <br /> 219 <br />Allison Reinert said that the Water Research Foundation has some very interesting information on what pharmaceuticals and 220 <br />personal care products might be in your drinking water. 221 <br /> 222 <br />Randy Marshall said that there are a lot of happy fish in the Great Lakes. 223 <br /> 224 <br />Tony Blake initiated discussion of the next agenda item. 225 <br /> 226 AGENDA ITEM 3: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS – FLOOD REGULATIONS 227 <br /> To review government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO pertaining to flood regulations 228 Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 229 <br /> 230 <br />Michael Harvey reviewed the abstract (page 19). This UDO text amendment is 70 pages in length addressing modifications in 231 <br />the floodplain management program. He discussed the baseline for the County’s involvement in this program which started in 232 <br />1976. Entry into this program requires that the County adopt a minimum model ordinance to address the basic tools in dealing 233 <br />with development to ensure when and if there is a flood event, you will not lose unnecessarily property or endanger the 234 <br />general health, safety and welfare of the residents. The County has approx. 80 parcels where existing structures are located in 235 <br />the floodplain. There are 4,000 – 5,000 parcels within Orange County that are encumbered by floodplain. Mr. Harvey pointed 236 <br />out that Orange County is not the coast nor is it Wake County; both areas have significant areas in floodplain. Flood damage 237 <br />prevention and flood management are not necessarily a huge problem for the County, but the County has always made a 238 <br />conscious effort to be proactive in going beyond the minimum model. For example, the County requires buffers around 239 <br />floodplain to prohibit development within the floodplain; if there is nothing built within the floodplain, it will not get destroyed 240 <br />when it floods. The buffer rule also provides a recharge area to help with stormwater inundation and other factors, some of 241 <br />which Ms. Reinert noted in her presentation. The County also adopted other standards included a freeboard requirement. Mr. 242 <br />Harvey reviewed briefly how floodplain regulation works. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) creates maps 243 <br />based on engineering studies of floodplain to examine the questions like – how high is water going to go? Even though no one 244 <br />really knows the answer to this question, FEMA provides reliable data. If someone is going to build in the floodplain, the first 245 <br />floor of habitable living space has to be out of harm’s way. If the Base Flood Elevation is 500 feet, the minimum model 246 <br />ordinance says that the first floor of habitable space, including utilities, has to be at 500 feet to prevent destruction in a flood 247 <br />event. Orange County adds 2 feet of freeboard (502 feet in this example) to ensure more safety in a major flood event. 248 <br />Additionally, the County prohibits development or “activities” in the floodplain, specifically no houses, no industrial areas, and 249 <br />related activities, roads and utilities excluded. In 2007, the County adopted a Flood Hazard Overlay District based on flood 250 <br />map data by overlaying this data onto the County’s zoning atlas map, and updated what activities were allowable and 251 <br />prohibited based on FEMA guidelines. Mr. Harvey asked if anyone on the Board had heard of a Community Ratings System 252 <br />(one person raised a hand). The Community Ratings System (CRS) is an independent assessment of a community’s 253 <br />compliance with flood regulation and provides a ranking from 1-10 (1 is the best). Flood insurance premiums are based off of 254 <br />this ranking. Residents living in a community with a ranking of 10 could face $1,000 a year in flood insurance premium. 255 <br />Orange County has a current ranking of 6, a good rating which provides a 25% reduction in annual floodplain insurance 256 <br />premiums for residents. The Planning Department does a lot of outreach, upholds regulatory components, and has a close 257 <br />working relationship with the Erosion Control and Stormwater department, all helpful in promoting floodplain regulation 258 <br />education to the public. At this juncture, the County is about to adopt a new set of floodplain maps. During the review process, 259 <br />the current administration and County Attorney’s Office were shocked that there is a Flood Hazard Overlay District. As a 260 <br />participating community, Orange County has to adopt the maps because they are utilized to show current floodplain and will 261 <br />help guide development throughout the County. 262 <br /> 263 <br />Kim Piracci asked if the maps show that the floodplain has gotten worse. 264 <br /> 265 <br />Michael Harvey answered that in some cases, there are dramatic changes, and in other instances, areas are no worse off. Mr. 266 <br />Harvey said that the maps are kind of a wash. Some residents who were unhappy with the results of the map went through the 267 <br />appeals process with FEMA. However, the maps were supposed to have been adopted 3 years ago. The delay has been due 268 <br />to several reasons, namely that some of the data changed with successful appeals from residents and that FEMA found 269 <br /> 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.