Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 090617
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
OCPB agenda 090617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 3:38:41 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 3:38:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 090617
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br />Kim Piracci asked for the definition of “Sexually Oriented Businesses.” 529 <br /> 530 <br />Michael Harvey answered that it is anything that meets the state statutory definition, including businesses like adult 531 <br />cabaret, adult bookstore, adult motion picture theater, “adult hotel,” and other examples defined in the UDO. 532 <br /> 533 <br />Randy Marshall asked if massage parlors are included in these examples. 534 <br /> 535 <br />Michael Harvey answered that a massage parlor is a recognized physical therapy treatment center, albeit, if they 536 <br />offer certain services, it could be a violation of state rules and local ordinances. 537 <br /> 538 <br />Randy Marshall asked if “adult massage parlor” was included in the definition. 539 <br /> 540 <br />Michael Harvey answered that it was not specifically included, and said that the sexually oriented business category 541 <br />is a global land use category of a myriad of different activities. 542 <br /> 543 <br />Kim Piracci asked if the category includes in the retail sales of certain clothing and that kind of thing? 544 <br /> 545 <br />Michael Harvey said that no, but it would include the sale of adult oriented merchandise, including videos and 546 <br />devices, for example. These businesses are currently only allowed in industrial districts. He said that there are also 547 <br />percentages that come into play here; for example, a convenience store or video store that sells sexually-oriented 548 <br />magazines or rents sexually oriented movies is not be a sexually oriented business because the percentage of the 549 <br />sales that you generates is less than the majority of overall sales. If a store sells only lingerie, it is a clothing store, 550 <br />but if it sells other merchandise defined in sexually oriented businesses, the store may only be permitted in certain 551 <br />districts. 552 <br /> 553 <br />Michael Harvey continued with his presentation (page 157) and discussed Telecommunications. While Staff is not 554 <br />proposing any changes to this category, there will likely need to be an overhaul to existing standards in the UDO 555 <br />soon, based on recent changes to state law (and more changes coming). Mr. Harvey asked that the Board skip its 556 <br />review of Temporary Uses (page 158) for now as the County Attorney and he are continuing to work on this section. 557 <br />He will keep the Board up-to-date on any changes. The “Temporary Uses” categories was created because there 558 <br />are temporary uses in the UDO, and the mantra during this process was to list them in the Table, but they may be 559 <br />left out of the Table and remain in Article 5 only. Mr. Harvey reviewed “Utilities” (page 159) next and said that Staff 560 <br />is not making any changes. He reminded that Board that the County Attorney and Staff are reviewing what legal 561 <br />authority they have in permitting utilities, and where the County could be preempted by state law. He used the 562 <br />example of the case of Special Use Permit proposing a regional gas line in Orange County several years ago. Even 563 <br />though the entity was required to get, and did obtain, a Class B Special Use Permit, they vehemently argued that 564 <br />they did not have to obtain such a permit. Since they did not appeal the decision, the permit requirement did not 565 <br />change. Looking back on the case, there is some thought that with activities regulative under the Utilities 566 <br />Commission, the County may not have as much regulatory authority as they think. This will be reviewed and 567 <br />handled as part of a separate process. As current regulations entail, there are certain activities permitted by right, 568 <br />while others only with a Special Use Permit. Staff is not changing any of the current requirements. 569 <br /> 570 <br />Lydia Wegman asked for the definition for “Solar Array – Large Facility.” 571 <br /> 572 <br />Michael Harvey said that a large facility can generate over 100,000 kilowatts. 573 <br /> 574 <br />Randy Marshall also asked for more information about solar arrays being put on schools or other government 575 <br />buildings. 576 <br /> 577 <br />Michael Harvey responded that language in Article 5, Section 9.6 spells-out that for non-residential activities the 578 <br />solar array is limited to the amount of kilowatts necessary to support the operation of your project. Following Mr. 579 <br />Marshall’s example, if there is a school with a need for 50,000 kilowatts of power, there could be solar arrays on-580 <br /> 15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.