Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 090617
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
OCPB agenda 090617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 3:38:41 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 3:38:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 090617
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />10 <br />are going to provide Staff with some comments on the possibility of expanding where these businesses are 476 <br />allowed. Currently, “Sexually Oriented Businesses” are only allowed in two industrial zoning districts. 477 <br /> 478 <br />Lydia Wegman asked if it would be helpful to have comments from the Planning Board on this topic. 479 <br />Michael Harvey said that the Board’s comments are welcome. 480 <br /> 481 <br />Lydia Wegman noted that she supports his position on “Sexually Oriented Businesses” and thinks that it is the best 482 <br />for Orange County. 483 <br /> 484 <br />Michael Harvey thanked Lydia. 485 <br /> 486 <br />Michael Harvey reviewed “Day Spa” (page 155) and said that the County Attorney asked if this category could be 487 <br />combined with those similar, like beauty and barber shops, nail salons, and tanning salons. The rationale against 488 <br />this is that someone could have a nail salon or a massage operation or a tanning salon without having all the other 489 <br />services of a day spa. Mr. Harvey believes each should be a separate category, including “Day Spa,” instead of an 490 <br />overriding category that does not provide flexibility. He also noted that per discussions at the last Planning Board 491 <br />meeting and with the County Attorney, “Repair Services” (page 156) will be collapsed into one central category and 492 <br />further defined and differentiated in Article 5. As an example, if bicycle repair is not in Neighborhood Commercial 493 <br />districts, this should be spelled-out in Article 5, not in Definitions. 494 <br /> 495 <br />Randy Marshall asked how “Tourist Home” is different from the other categories. 496 <br /> 497 <br />Michael Harvey responded that “Tourist Home” is different in terms of how many bedrooms and types of services it 498 <br />allows. At a bed and breakfast (Inn or Country Inn), there is the ability to serve food and is usually run out of the 499 <br />proprietor’s home, whereas a “Tourist Home” is more like a hotel, but not considered to be a commercial operation. 500 <br />“Tourist Homes” are currently allowed in certain residential districts. This may end-up being combined with “Rural 501 <br />Guest Establishments – Bed and Breakfast” but there has been no directive to address this by the County Attorney 502 <br />at this time. 503 <br /> 504 <br />David Blankfard asked if “Tourist Home” has to be in rural areas. 505 <br /> 506 <br />Michael Harvey answered that the “Tourist Home” is allowed in higher intensity residential districts, whereas “Rural 507 <br />Guest Establishments” are allowed in agricultural and residential districts. 508 <br /> 509 <br />David Blankfard followed-up with the example that if he wanted to have an Air B&Bs in downtown Hillsborough, 510 <br />would it be classified as a “Tourist Home?” 511 <br /> 512 <br />Michael Harvey answered that following that example, in a more urban setting he may have to do the tourist home. 513 <br /> 514 <br />Alexander Gregory said that it seems like “Tourist Home” is more like an Air B&B option. 515 <br /> 516 <br />Michael Harvey said that this could be the case. He went on to say that there are sufficient court cases that would 517 <br />prohibit someone from renting out their house for a week or a month or six months. With Air B&B there are a 518 <br />plethora of options, and if it is a bed and breakfast, there need to be the appropriate permits. If someone decides to 519 <br />rent his/her/their house out for a week, is that a commercial land use? Various court cases over the years have 520 <br />determined that no, it does not. In a recent court case in Currituck County, a 24-bedroom house was found to be a 521 <br />single family residence, not a commercial land use operation. It is hard to take an example from a coastal region 522 <br />where the economies and scale are different than the Piedmont, but the 24-bedroom house is classified this way for 523 <br />permitting purposes and is rented out, and this is an un-regulated activity. The provision of service, like breakfast, 524 <br />puts something into the category of a bed and breakfast or a tourist home. Issues around Air B&Bs continue to be 525 <br />reported and considered by Staff, and Staff will continue to be cognizant of what separates a “transient hotel-ish” 526 <br />situation from a single family residential situation. 527 <br /> 528 <br /> 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.