OCPB agenda 020117 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

12 bottom of 48 and all of 49, this is government uses and public administration. That’s a category under the NAICS code. We’re 595 getting into executive, legislative, and other general governmental support, executive offices, legislative bodies, and public 596 finance. 597 598 Lisa Stuckey: Michael, if you and the other Michael Harvey’s in the state are all doing this is this not a ridiculous and huge 599 reproduction of effort? 600 601 Michael Harvey: Well that’s the problem because the other Michael Harvey’s in the state aren’t necessarily doing it this way 602 because the other Michael Harvey’s of the state don’t answer to the County Attorneys for Orange County. Orange County’s 603 legal advice is to say you need to fix our table permitted uses to make sure we don’t find ourselves in a predicament where 604 we’re going to get sued and lose because of Byrd v. Franklin. 605 606 Lydia Wegman: But it was a State Supreme Court decision, so it applies statewide but each County is responding in its own 607 fashion. 608 609 Craig Benedict: Everybody has a different opinion of what uses they would want in their area and what would be prohibited. 610 When I worked in Florida I used a rendition of the previous NAICS called the standard industrial code classification. I used 611 major categories in there, I didn’t list it but it was just better, it was organized to talk about manufacturing and assembling and 612 distribution and warehousing. It seemed to have some organization and we listed as many prohibited uses as we could think 613 of, but things changed over time. 614 615 Tony Blake: I think the minute you include the NAICS numbers you’re opening yourself to anything you leave out. 616 617 Michael Harvey: Yeah, and I think some of the direction I’ve received is to take the NAICS numbers out. They’re here to give 618 you a reference point right now. 619 620 Craig Benedict: We may use our own numbering. 621 622 Tony Blake: Well your own numbering would be useful if it was in a separate column and it could be from a data perspective. If 623 it’s an individual index it could make data indexing faster, it could make organization faster when it’s electronic. 624 625 Lydia Wegman: Just going back to the governmental uses, there doesn’t seem to be much benefit to the NAICS code in that 626 instance. 627 628 Paul Guthrie: What is your deadline to get this done? 629 630 Michael Harvey: Well you all are going to be reviewing it in June or July for recommendation with a public hearing in 631 September. 632 633 Lydia Wegman: But you did say we might have other ORC discussions? 634 635 Michael Harvey: Well there are going to be a lot of ORC discussions. You’re cited to do a minimum of at least one more. I’m 636 probably thinking there will be one more after that so you guys are going to see this in a couple different f ormats. I’ve kept 637 manufacturing, assembly, and processing consistent with the work you’ve already done that begins on page 51. There was no 638 reason to change that. I thought the work you all did with Perdita and the work she did needed to be preserved. So that is 639 incorporated verbatim from what you’ve already seen, and done, and played with. Let me ask you a question as we get to 640 page 57. Medical uses. We currently break down medical uses really to health services over 10,000, health services under 641 10,000. I don’t see a reason to have an arbitrary square footage limit because I can actually think of several health services at 642 9,000, 8,000, 7,000 square feet that would probably be something you don’t want in several districts, and some let’s say at 643 2,000, 3,000 you may want to allow in more prevalent locations. So if you’re comfortable I’m going to abandon the square 644 footage issue and just list out what I consider health services using some of the makes, physicians’ officers and the likes. Are 645 you all ok with that for the next draft? 646 647 Unanimous approval. 648 19