Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 120716
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 120716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 3:16:32 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 3:14:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/7/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 120716
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY NOTES 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 NOVEMBER 2, 2016 3 ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 4 <br /> 5 <br />NOTE: A quorum is not required for Ordinance Review Committee meetings. 6 <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large, Chapel Hill Township; Tony Blake (Vice-chair), Bingham Township 8 <br />Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Kim Piracci, At-Large; Maxecine Mitchell, At-Large Bingham 9 <br />Township; Lisa Stuckey, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Andrea Rohrbacher, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Patricia 10 <br />Roberts, Cheeks Township Representative; 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Perdita Holtz; Planning 14 <br />Systems Coordinator; Patrick Mallett, Planner II, Rachel McCook, Planner I; Meredith Kern , Administrative Assistant II. 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 18 19 <br />Lydia Wegman called meeting to order. 20 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 AGENDA ITEM 2: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS – TEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL UNITS 23 CONDITIONAL DISTRICT 24 <br /> To review and comment upon proposed amendments to the UDO that would establish a new 25 <br />conditional zoning district for temporary housing units. 26 Presenter: Patrick Mallett, Planner II 27 28 <br />Patrick Mallett reviewed the abstract. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Lisa Stuckey: I don’t understand why we have to go through these charades. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Patrick Mallett: That’s the way the state building code, the health codes, all of the codes are defined. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Lisa Stuckey: So these are not built to habitable standards? 35 <br /> 36 <br />Patrick Mallett: Yes, once you go beyond that magic day it becomes a permanent structure or residence. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Lisa Stuckey: So what about the tiny homes? On TV I’ve seen tiny homes subdivisions. These are very permanent. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Patrick Mallett: They’re not. You could do a subdivision, theoretically, with 10 lots and do 10 tiny homes that meet the 41 <br />minimum lot standards. I think part of the rub is unless you do something like a cluster subdivision, you end up with a 300 42 <br />square foot tiny home on a 1-acre lot. It may work, it may not. I think that the cost of the land basis kind of drives that out of 43 <br />the realm of reality. It definitely does in the Rural Buffer where you’ve got 2-acre to 5-acre lots. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Tony Blake: They’re doing it in Chatham County but when they did it there was no zoning at all so they were able to pull it 46 <br />together. 47 <br /> 48 <br />Patrick Mallett: Right now, you would either build the tiny home on a foundation that could be a stick built, and most of them 49 <br />are not long enough. You can also build to a modular home standard; a mobile home standard; or now an RV Park Model 50 <br />Standard of construction. 51 <br /> 52 <br />Lydia Wegman: I don’t know. The ones I’ve seen that are not that big. 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.