Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 110216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 110216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:28:48 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:23:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/2/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 110216
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because the UDO has been amended since these comments were made, referenced sections may be slightly off as some portions of the UDO have been <br />renumbered. <br />19 <br />Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment <br />78. <br />Change to require a to Class "A" Special Use Permit, which would <br />require BOCC approval rather than Board of Adjustment -- Section <br />5.9.5 <br />This is in reference to Electric, Gas and Liquid Fuel Transmission Lines <br />which currently require a Class B SUP (approved by the Board of <br />Adjustment). A Class A SUP would have to be approved by the BOCC <br />(with a recommendation made by the Planning Board). The Class A <br />process is usually longer since it requires review by the Planning Board <br />and a quarterly public hearing whereas a public hearing by the Board of <br />Adjustment can be scheduled to occur any month. The BOCC would have <br />to make a decision on whether it would like to change the approval <br />process for this type of use froma Class B SUP to a Class A SUP. Staff's <br />opinion is, given the findings of fact are the same, if an applicant <br />demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the UDO a permit must <br />be issued, regardless of which decision-making body issues the permit. <br />79. <br />Mention Water and Sewer Management and Planning Boundary <br />Agreement. Any system should be designed, planned, constructed <br />and maintained by the responsible entity as assigned through the <br />Agreement -- Section 7.13.4 (C) (1) (b) <br />80. <br />[Staff note: the comments in sage-colored boxes were made by <br />Animal Services staff] As I suspect you know, the <br />County’s Animal Control Ordinance includes kennel definitions and <br />a permitting process for Class I and Class II Kennels. The County’s <br />Zoning Ordinance also includes kennel definitions and process for <br />a kennel (or stable) to obtain a special use permit (which requires <br />one or possibly both of the permits issued Animal Control). <br />Planning staff believes the processes have been 'better coordinated' with <br />the approval of a UDO text amendment package in January of 2012. A <br />kennel is now a separate land use category from a stable. <br /> 81
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.