Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Because the UDO has been amended since these comments were made, referenced sections may be slightly off as some portions of the UDO have been <br />renumbered. <br />9 <br />Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment <br />24.Need to revisit private road standards. <br />Transportation Planning staff has begun work on this topic. An Info Item <br />was included on the December 9, 2014 BOCC agenda and it was <br />discussed at the May 12, 2015 BOCC work session. <br />25. <br />There's a lack of land use criteria for reserving school sites. Need <br />some general guidelines (i.e. not in wetlands or on slopes greater <br />than X). Consult County School Joint Construction Standards. <br />26.Relation to adjacent properties is not addressed -- Section 7.13.3 <br />(C) (1) <br />27.Is there any limit to building height? Flag for future. <br />The amendments pertaining to economic development that were <br />adopted on February 7, 2012 set a maximum height limit (see Section <br />6.2.2) <br />28.Are there provisions for shared driveways? It may be useful in <br />certain cases (i.e. along highways/major roadways). <br />The Efland-Cheeks Overlay District (ECOD) has provisions for shared <br />driveways. Additionally, the two Efland zoning overlay districts, adopted <br />April 7, 2015, have provisions for shared driveways. <br /> 71