Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 110216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 110216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:28:48 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:23:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/2/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 110216
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because the UDO has been amended since these comments were made, referenced sections may be slightly off as some portions of the UDO have been <br />renumbered. <br />1 <br />Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment <br />Economic Development Ideas <br />page 11 <br />Streamline procedures for Economic Development Districts and <br />commercial development applications. Consider expedited <br />processing for such applications. <br />Significant amendments pertaining to economic development were <br />adopted on February 7, 2012. Staff recommends waiting to re-evaluate <br />the process until after a project has been processed under the revised <br />regulations. <br />page 11 <br />Study what local private businesses need in order to expand and <br />thrive, and consider what regulatory changes could contribute to <br />that objective. <br />page 11 Consider different standards for application within Economic <br />Development Districts to encourage commercial development. <br />Significant amendments pertaining to economic development were <br />adopted on February 7, 2012. Staff recommends waiting to re-evaluate <br />the process until after a project has been processed under the revised <br />regulations. Standards in the EDDs are still more rigorous than standards <br />in the Commercial and Commercial-Industrial Transition Nodes. It may <br />be desirable to review whether the standards should be different. <br />page 11 Create a predictable process for consideration of development <br />applications within Economic Development Districts. <br />Significant amendments pertaining to economic development were <br />adopted on February 7, 2012. Staff recommends waiting to re-evaluate <br />the process until after a project has been processed under the revised <br />regulations. <br />page 11 Develop regulations for Rural Economic Development Areas. <br />A REDA conditional zoning district was adopted for the NC57/Speedway <br />area on June 5, 2012. A "Rural Master Plan" Conditional Zoning District is <br />currently being worked on by staff; a public hearing in 2017 is expected. <br />Permitted Uses and Standards Ideas <br />page 12 <br />Differentiate between suburban and rural character, and adjust <br />regulations relating to required features such as signing and <br />transportation improvements. <br />Will be considered as topics are brought forward for revision. For <br />example, changes to Outdoor Lighting standards, adopted Jan. 24, 2013, <br />has slightly different standards for urbanizing vs. rural areas. Home <br />Occupation standards (adopted May 20, 2014) have different standards <br />based somewhat on lot size. <br />Note: The ideas in the main body of the Implementation Bridge also appear in the Appendix, although they may be worded differently or <br />may combine several separate comments into one idea. <br /> 63
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.