Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 110216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 110216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:28:48 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:23:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/2/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 110216
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />9 <br />Tony Blake: But your utilities can be shrunken down and concentrated. 431 <br /> 432 <br />Patrick Mallett: Yeah. Examples would be Henderson Woods… 433 <br /> 434 <br />Kim Piracci: Is there a sweet spot between too close and… Because I’ve lived in a subdivision and I loved it until I 435 <br />didn’t. My son couldn’t practice drums, I couldn’t leave my house without getting barked at by a vicious dog, it was a 436 <br />great idea until it became difficult to live there and so I can see the idea but I suspect there’s a sweet spot. Like half 437 <br />an acre is a good size. 438 <br /> 439 <br />Craig Benedict: It depends on the residence. Sometimes we’ve had occasions where people bought rural areas and 440 <br />complained about rooster noises. Or somebody would say, “Don’t you have required street lights?” and in rural 441 <br />areas we don’t require street lights so it becomes a choice and sometimes it’s a transition. So there are some pretty 442 <br />close environments so it’s just consumer choices. What we should do is just not directly related to this but just to 443 <br />give you an example, we’ll bring some maps and show you the conventional and then we’ll take you in the field, just 444 <br />yesterday it was such a beautiful day, I was driving around to some subdivisions that we approved back in early 445 <br />2000. I’ll show you but I wont mention it but they’re not pretty. They backed on roads onto roads and they’re 446 <br />supposed to have some landscaping and trees back there and it just never happened. They died. So this, we 447 <br />should be able during the process to tuck these away off the road so when you go down a rural area you’re going to 448 <br />still see the roadside trees and most likely we’ll be able to tuck them off the road. Not too far to make the road cost 449 <br />but enough to take a rural character. 450 <br /> 451 <br />Patrick Mallett: And I think if there’s some people that want the 2 acres and more and then there’s another group of 452 <br />people that kind of want to be in a rural setting but they don’t necessarily want to maintain it all. I think maintaining 5 453 <br />acres is a lot of work. 454 <br /> 455 <br />Craig Benedict: And they might want a neighbor within a certain distance, versus so isolated. 456 <br /> 457 <br />Patrick Mallett: This gives it more choices. I think that the realization that it doesn’t need to be such a short drop off 458 <br />from Southern Village to the rural area. 459 <br /> 460 <br />Tony Blake: Just as a comment; I like the fact that small family farms can set up an area like this, still keep the farm, 461 <br />and use this as an annuity, sell 1 lot one year, sell another lot the next year and so on. 462 <br /> 463 <br />Kim Piracci: Are they going to be able to do that though? 464 <br /> 465 <br />Patrick Mallett: So part of what this would allow, and that’s another sort of short coming to the minor subdivision, is 466 <br />that you have to build it all at once and that includes the road. It sort of forces you to do all of it 100% up front. With 467 <br />this, just like with the major, you could include with your request a phasing plan. Many farms are faced with the 468 <br />proposition of… The average age of the farmer is pretty high. They’re facing 300-acre family farm that’s been in the 469 <br />family for generations and generations… 470 <br /> 471 <br />Curtis Bane: And have to get put in there as a tenant farmer and never get anything in your name. And a lot of people 472 <br />can’t even put their children in a place on their farm. 473 <br /> 474 <br />Patrick Mallett: So this would allow them to maybe do some.. Let’s just say that they get a subdivision approved for 475 <br />8 units on 30 acres of the 300-acre farm and it’s off to the farm. It doesn’t gut the farm, it doesn’t require 80 acres 476 <br />under the exempt subdivisions to get done, and it doesn’t require them to sell all of those 8 lots at a time… And 477 <br />that’s one of the other realizations to this. Just the land cost, I’m speaking very general terms, if you go way out 478 <br />past Hurdle Mills you’re going to get a land cost that’s cheaper but closer in you’re going to get anywhere from 479 <br />$15,000-$30,000 an acre in land basis. If you got in the rural buffer a minimum density requirement and lot size of 2 480 <br />acres or 5 acres, that’s a lot of money in the land that a working or even a middle class person may not be able to 481 <br />afford. This isn’t going to be 100% cheaper but it, theoretically, would allow them to get into a rural setting without 482 <br />having to pay such an exorbitant land cost. 483 <br /> 484 <br /> 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.