Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
<br />2 <br /> 55 <br /> 56 PUBLIC CHARGE 57 <br />The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its 58 <br />citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with 59 <br />fellow citizens. At any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this 60 <br />public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual 61 <br />regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting 62 <br />until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. 63 <br /> 64 <br /> 65 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS 66 <br /> 67 <br />No comments 68 <br /> 69 Agenda Item 7: Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment - To review revisions suggested 70 <br />by the Attorney’s office after the August 3 Planning Board meeting (where this text 71 <br />amendment was previously acted upon) and make a recommendation to the BOCC on 72 <br />government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO that would modify existing 73 <br />regulations that pertain to the Hillsborough Economic Development District. This item is 74 <br />scheduled for the September 12, 2016 quarterly public hearing. 75 Presenter: Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator 76 <br /> 77 <br />Perdita Holtz reviewed the abstract. 78 <br /> 79 <br />Tony Blake: I have a question here because it says that it’s a change in the list but it looks like the change is wrong. 80 <br />The 7 and 8 should have been deleted and the green 9 should have been a 7. 81 <br /> 82 <br />Perdita Holtz: Well yes, but the list is generated automatically through a styling of the document and so if you delete 83 <br />7 and 8 it doesn’t automatically update. It will change. 84 <br /> 85 <br />Perdita Holtz continued presentation. 86 <br /> 87 <br />Lydia Wegman: Why did the attorney feel that change was needed? 88 <br /> 89 <br />Perdita Holtz: He seemed to feel that by definition accessory uses are allowed in all zoning districts and limiting an 90 <br />accessory use to only one type of use is not really kosher in his view. 91 <br /> 92 <br />Lisa Stuckey: So could you have a freestanding restaurant, or does it have to be part of something else? 93 <br /> 94 <br />Perdita Holtz: You could not have a freestanding restaurant by right. You’d have to go through the MPDCZ process. 95 <br /> 96 <br />Perdita Holtz continued presentation. 97 <br /> 98 <br /> 99 MOTION by Tony Blake to approve the Statement of Consistency. Seconded by Lisa Stuckey. 100 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 101 <br /> 102 MOTION by Lisa Stuckey to approve the amendment package. Seconded by Tony Blake. 103 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 104 <br /> 105 Agenda Item 8: Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment - To review revisions suggested 106 <br />by the Attorney’s office after the August 3 Planning Board meeting (where this text 107 <br />amendment was previously acted upon) and make a recommendation to the BOCC on 108 <br /> 8