Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 101716
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 101716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:23:46 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:12:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 101716
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 3: Base Zoning Districts <br /> Section 3.3: Residential Districts <br /> <br /> <br />Orange County, North Carolina – Unified Development Ordinance Page 3-3 <br /> <br /> <br />RB DISTRICT SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS <br />1. Uses shall be restricted to those indicated for the RB District in Section 5.2, unless a Conditional Use (CU) <br />or MPD-CZ District is approved (see Section 3.8). <br />2. Development within the zoning district shall be subject to all applicable use standards detailed in Article 5 <br />and all applicable development standards detailed in Article 6 of this Ordinance. <br />3. While the Minimum Lot Size may be 87,120 square feet, the density permitted on a given parcel is based on <br />the Watershed Protection Overlay District in which the property is located. Refer to Section 4.2.4 for a <br />breakdown of the allowable density (i.e., the number of individual dwellings that can be developed on a <br />parcel of property). <br />4. Allowable impervious surface area is based on the Watershed Protection Overlay District in which the <br />property is located. Refer to Section 4.2.5 for a breakdown of the allowable impervious surface area. <br />5. For lots outside of a Watershed Protection Overlay District (see Section 4.2), the minimum usable lot area <br />for lots that utilize ground absorption wastewater systems shall be 30,000 square feet for parcels between <br />40,000 square feet and 1.99 acres in size; zoning lots two acres and greater in size shall have a minimum <br />usable lot area of at least 40,000 square feet.4 <br /> 65. With the exception of Orange County government development projects, wastewater treatment facilities with <br />a design capacity of 3,000 gallons per day or more and package treatment plants for sanitary sewage <br />disposal are prohibited in the RB zoning district unless approved through the Special Use Permit (SUP) <br />process or as a Conditional Use (CU) District. <br />67. Proposed subdivisions are subject to all applicable subdivision standards detailed in Article 7. Note that <br />Article 7 provides for different dimensional requirements than those shown in the Dimensional and Ratio <br />Standards table depending upon the type of subdivision proposed and the percentage of open space <br />provided. The “Village Option” for a flexible development is not permitted in the RB districts. <br />78. Subdivisions utilizing , following the conventional design process, and/or proposing private roads are <br />subject to larger setbacks and minimum lot sizes than those listed in the Dimensional and Ratio Standards. <br />Refer to Section 7.8.4 for additional requirements. Refer to Section 7.8.5 for private road standards.5 <br />89. The storage of junked or wrecked motor vehicles is prohibited except if the vehicle is stored in an enclosed <br />building that conforms to applicable building code and zoning regulations or if such building is a legal non- <br />conforming use. <br /> <br /> <br />4 This standard is being eliminated as it would impede the ability for a property owner to adhere to the new State <br />septic system guidelines/statutes as well as invalidate proposed amendments designed to encourage greater <br />clustering of lots and preservation of common open space. <br />5 Private road justification is still required for all subdivisions following the conventional design model (i.e. not <br />proposing separate open space). Staff is modifying existing language to ensure consistency with proposed changes <br />to Article 7. <br /> 144
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.