Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 101716
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 101716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:23:46 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:12:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 101716
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />He said the ingredients of housing costs are: land, public or private infrastructure, entitlements <br />in permit fees, cost of housing, cost of labor, profitmargins, and market aspects. He said the <br />areas, which can be affected and changed, are being considered. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said he would love to hear on going updates fromthe multi- <br />department effort. <br />Commissioner Rich said when theBOCC approved the developmentof Whitfield the <br />developer made voluntary contributions to affordable housing. She said the idea of affordable <br />housing in the rural partof the County should be considered as well as who is beingserved by <br />the affordable housing. <br />Craig Benedict said staff has reviewed the inventory of affordable housing in the rural <br />parts of the County. He said a comprehensive picture will be presented to the BOCC. <br />Chair McKee suggested breaking affordable housing into two sections: low income <br />affordable housing (Community Home Trust, Habitat, etc.); and work force affordable housing <br />125,000 to $150,000 homes). <br />Michael Harvey said looking at the comprehensive planand the land use map, high <br />intensity housing, in the 10 to 20 year transitions, is the highway 70 corridor, certain areas near <br />Hillsborough and Durham, and some areas of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. He said it is clustered <br />in these areas as the services are located there as well. <br />Chair McKeeasked if alternative water and sewersystems are being considered, can <br />work forceaffordable housing be offered outsidethese high dollar areas just mentioned by <br />Michael Harvey. <br />Michael Harvey said one of the rationales for recommending a rural residential master <br />plan development process is to allow that type of dialogue to occur. He said it is important to <br />remember that there are some intrinsic limits to such a dialogue, based on a density discussion <br />that must occur at another work session. He said the village concept isa possibility if the <br />infrastructure obstacles can be overcome. <br />Chair McKee said some smaller local builders may be attracted to these options. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said this discussion occurredat the BOCC retreat three years ago <br />and the idea of clustered development with on-site community systems was considered. He <br />said it is time to move past discussion and totry something. <br />Commissioner Price said she would like to try the cluster developments with a small <br />number ofhomes. She said those of modest income, who wish to live in a rural setting, should <br />be able to do so. <br />Commissioner Rich referred to the map on page 77 and asked if Michael Harvey could <br />clarify the dark grey areas. <br />Michael Harvey said these are transition areasthat are managed, from a zoning <br />standpoint, by either Chapel Hill or Carrboro. He said the County has granted authority for <br />those areas to be developed in accordance withthe joint planning landuse planning agreement. <br />Commissioner Rich referred to the triangle on the bottom of the map, which is identified <br />as rural buffer. Sheasked if there is a reason this portion of land is considered as such. <br />Michael Harvey said that goesback to the joint planning land use planning agreement. <br />He said the area was rural in nature, with lots of farms. <br />Chair McKee recalledthe discussion about the extension of the water line for fire <br />protection in that area. <br />Commissioner Rich said this triangular area seems out of character given that Chatham <br />County is developing right up to theedge of it. <br />Craig Benedict said it is known as the "lost triangle". <br />Michael Harvey saidbased on thisworksession, the BOCC desires a presentation <br />regarding how the options discussed this evening will look and a future work session on density. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he hoped this discussion would include tax implications of <br />the variouspossibilities. <br /> 122
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.