Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 101716
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 101716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:23:46 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:12:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 101716
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />Michael Harvey said developers have the right tobring forth a conventionalsubdivision <br />designbut it may not successfully obtain a staff or Planning Board recommendation. <br />Commissioner Jacobs saidthe County can state its design preference andthe flexible <br />modelwas promoted and encouraged in the rural character study. <br />Michael Harvey said in his tenureatOrangeCounty, he has mostly seen either flexible <br />development subdivisions with open space or the conservation subdivision. He said until 2013, <br />the Joint Planning Agreement did not allowclustering in thenorthern portion of the rural buffer. <br />Chair McKee said historically, the buyer's preference was for a largelot configuration <br />with clearly identified corners. He asked if there has been a transition in what buyers are <br />wanting. <br />Michael Harvey said possibly but he believes the biggest issue is cost. He said the <br />conventional model requires greater expense by the developer and greater adherence to <br />separate development regulatorystandards. <br />Commissioner Rich asked if the openspaceneeds to be maintained. <br />Michael Harvey said yes. He said if a storm comes through and knocks down trees <br />there is an obligation to reestablish the required buffers and open space. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if there is a densitybonus. <br />Michael Harvey saidthe onlyrecognized density options are for affordable housing or if <br />a greater area of open space if preserved. He said density bumps are not allowed in protected <br />watershed areas as density is already set. He said density bumps are also not allowed in the <br />northern part of the rural buffer as density is set by the joint planning land use plan and <br />agreement. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if density bumps arenot allowedanywhere in the rural <br />buffer. <br />Michael Harvey said correct. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said it is cheaper for developers to do thisbutthe end result is <br />very expensive housing. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said there are different kinds of open space. He said the rural <br />character study recommended 1.94 acre zoning throughout the County, which is the average lot <br />size in OrangeCounty. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said water and sewer management can be tricky but there are <br />some ideas about this in the rural character study. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if there are consequences when a homeowners' <br />association fails to maintain the open space, a stormwater system, etc. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said to call Michael Harvey. He added that he wanted the County <br />to review homeowners' agreements to insure that such problems are avoided. <br />Commissioner Rich said she lives in a neighborhood with dedicated open space which <br />the entire community commits to maintainwith twice annual workdays. She asked if farms can <br />be counted as open space. <br />Michael Harvey said farms can be counted as part of secondary open space in flexible <br />development projects. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said it may be something as simple as hay fields but it can lead to <br />potentialrevenue. <br />Commissioner Price referred to the discussionbetween conventional and flexible <br />models. She said there are developers that are happywith the flexible model and othersthat <br />were not, as it reducedthe number of homes theycould build in the development due to septic <br />issues. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said some subdivisions use the open space as secondaryseptic <br />areas which allows for no loss in density. <br />Commissioner Pelissierasked if any changeswere made to septic rules, would there be <br />any benefit to changing the rule for minor subdivision with five lots or less. <br /> 118
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.