Orange County NC Website
6 <br />D. ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLICHEARING <br />The public hearingwas adjourned at 7:26 p.m. <br />E. WORK SESSION <br />1. Review of MinimumLot Size and Density Allowances for Subdivisions —To review <br />and discuss the County's subdivision development and review processesfocusing <br />primarily on minimum lot size and density limitations as they relate to the clusteringof <br />proposed subdivision lots. <br />David Stancil, Department of the Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation <br />DEAPR) Director provided background regarding the Rural Character Study. He said in 1987, <br />the BOCC created a Joint Planning Area with the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. He said <br />part of thisJointPlanning Areawas the designation of the Rural Buffer. He said the mechanism <br />to implement this rural buffer was the implementation of the two-acre minimum lot size. He said <br />a study committee was created to consider how best to protect the rural integrity of the land. He <br />said the first area focused on the rural buffer, and the second area focused on the remaining <br />rural areas of the County. He said, simply put, the conclusion was to create a slidingscale <br />between open space and the ability to achieve a smaller lot size. He said a great deal of <br />thought went intothe decisions and the process was a high point in his time in OrangeCounty. <br />Craig Benedict said OrangeCounty's population has increased by about 50,000 people <br />since the rural character study was completed. He said the majority of these people went into <br />the cities but about 45% went into the unincorporated area. He said the originalgoalsof the <br />study started out as an open space preservation plan, balancing agricultural protection. He said <br />the interestingpart of this report is that, in large part, cooperation withthe plan was voluntary. <br />He said developers would submit two plans: a conventional one (10 acres, divided into five 2- <br />acre lots), and a flexible plan (10 acres, with five 1-acre lots, and five acres of open space). He <br />said the plans were reviewed, andthe decisionof which plan to use was placed on the <br />developer. He said initiallythe majority of developerschose the conventional plans but slowly <br />moved towards flexible plans. He said theprocessmoved from voluntary to being a bit more <br />direct, in order to achieve the outlinedgoals. <br />Craig Benedict said the conversation nowshifts to thenext 50,000 people moving into <br />Orange County and considering where they will live. He said projections are for lots of single- <br />family development to occur in the rural buffer due to demand. He said one of the goals from <br />the rural character study that remains in place today is the growth management goal: to have <br />urban growth boundaries; to have efficient formsof development; balance the natural resource <br />goals with pattern development and growth management. <br />Commissioner Rich said there wasprevious discussion about thegross overstatement <br />of projected population growth. She asked if there was an update on these numbers. <br />Craig Benedict said the originalnumbers were done for the entire triangle region. He <br />said hewill give a presentation on March 2 to Planning Board about how these numberswere <br />developedfor the 2040 plan. He said the 2045 plan is currently being worked on and it is hoped <br />that thecontrol totals, which are provided to the County, can be reviewed and more appropriate <br />estimates garnered. He said the formula for the projections (one house per every two acres), <br />cannot be altered, butthe numbers can be reviewed forrealisticestimates. <br />Michael Harvey, Orange County Current Planning, reviewed the following background <br />and PowerPoint slides: <br />PURPOSE: To review and discuss the County's subdivision development and review <br />processesfocusingprimarily on minimum lot size and densitylimitations as they relate to the <br />clustering of subdivision lots. This item was developed to address a petition submitted by <br /> 115