Browse
Search
BOA agenda 031218-cancelled
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
BOA agenda 031218-cancelled
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 1:47:24 PM
Creation date
3/12/2018 1:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/12/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT June 12, 2017 <br />3 <br />Barry Katz: Even if we don’t sit next to each other. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. So, why don’t you let me ask the county attorney his/her opinion and I will respond to 3 <br />you in an email with that answer. As far as the legislation, which we have been discussing offline briefly, 4 <br />there is a senate bill that passed second and third reading today that has been forwarded to the house. It is 5 <br />the farm act of 2017 that seeks to modify one of the many provisions it does is modify the grant of power 6 <br />section 153.A.340.B2 on what constitutes a farm. As you currently will recall from several meetings there 7 <br />are currently 5 methodologies for proving farm status. That is enrollment present use value, that is the 8 <br />sales tax exemption issued by the North Carolina Department of Revenue, that is a USDA farm number, 9 <br />that is a forest management plan, and that is a schedule F on your Federal Income Tax. The proposal that 10 <br />was reviewed by the senate eliminates the US Department of Ag. Farm number as one of the 11 <br />methodologies to prove your farm status. It further stipulates that if you are going engage in agrotourism 12 <br />activities, you either a) have to have a certificate issued by the North Carolina Department of Revenue 13 <br />claiming you are exempt from sales tax or you are enrolled in the Present Use Value program one of the 14 <br />two. Schedule F Federal Income Tax return and the Forrest Management Plan have no basis in law and if 15 <br />this is approved in giving you ability to have an agrotourism activity. Again, assuming this is approved. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Matt Hughes: In your opinion, are those two easier or harder than the current system? 18 <br /> 19 <br />Michael Harvey: Well the current system, which we can somewhat to agree to disagree, potentially would 20 <br />say that if you are a farm you can do agrotourism activities defined 106581.1.The current or the proposed 21 <br />system actually requires you comply with the two provisions actually are geared towards you as a farmer 22 <br />proving you have a certain amount of income to qualify. So present use value tracks over a several year/3 23 <br />year period earning a specific set dollar amount and the sales tax exemption also has criteria for earnings 24 <br />and what not. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Matt Hughes: So someone reading of that could mean that the only way you could engage in agrotourism is 27 <br />to have functioning farm for a certain number of years. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Michael Harvey: Within a structure, correct and that it says that if you are doing agrotourism within a 30 <br />building or structure. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Matt Hughes: You have actually get it up and running before, cart before the horse basically. Get it up and 33 <br />running and then. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Matt Hughes: Alright 38 <br /> 39 <br />Michael Harvey: In theory and the reason I say it that was is because the provision that is being amended 40 <br />makes specific reference to a building or structure. And the reason I am harping on that is because there is 41 <br />apart of me that ask the question Okay, what if I am not using a building or structure? 42 <br /> 43 <br />Matt Hughes: I believe legislator that put this forward is from Bladen County. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Michael Harvey: Well he represents Duplin County and other eastern North Carolina communities. If I am 46 <br />not mistaken his bio for the state senate website list, I think it list him as being a farmer an agrotourism 47 <br />business function. 48 <br /> 49 <br />197 of 200
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.