Browse
Search
Minutes 02-20-2018
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 02-20-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
3/9/2018 1:30:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/20/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
3/8/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Board Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 4-a - OWASA Annual Update Presentation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 4-b - FY2018-19 Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Continuation Budget
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 6-a - Greene Tract Conceptual Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 7-a - Orange County Sheriff’s Office Portable Audio-Video Recorders Policy
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 7-b - Update on the Mobile Home Parks Initiative
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-a- Minutes
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-b - Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Amendment #6
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-c - Application for NC Education Lottery Proceeds for CHCCS and Contingent Approval of BA # 6-A Related to CHCCS Capital Project Ordinances
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-d - Approval of 1.0 FTE Time-Limited Erosion Control Officer I Position and Budget Amendment #6-B
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-e - Resolution in Opposition To Offshore Exploration, Drilling Activities and Seismic Blast Activities Off the Coast of North Carolina
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-f - Authorization for NC Recreational Trails Program Grant - Hollow Rock Nature Park
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-g - Letter to Cardinal Innovations in Support of Club Nova’s Request for Capital Funding
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-1 - Information Item - February 6, 2018 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-2 - Information Item - Memorandum - Second Quarter FY2017-18 Financial Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-3 - Information Item – Memorandum - Continued Review of Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments on Signage
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-4 - Information Item - BOCC Chair Letter Regarding Petitions from February 6, 2018 Regular Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
ORD-2018-008 Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Amendment #6
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
ORD-2018-009 Application for NC Education Lottery Proceeds for CHCCS and Budget Amendment 5-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
ORD-2018-010 Approval of 1.0 FTE Time-Limited Erosion Control Officer I Position and Budget Amendment #6-B
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
RES-2018-012 Resolution in opposition to offshore exploration, drilling and seismic blast activities of the NC coast
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
28 <br /> <br />• The policy addresses when turning off the device is appropriate, which is usually when <br />the officer’s direct participation in an incident is completed, if the set out criteria no <br />longer fits, significant periods of inactivity, etc. <br />• The State’s retention schedule for Sheriff’s offices, which Orange County has adopted, <br />sets the floor for the different timelines for how long things should be retained. The <br />State sets it at 30 days, and Orange County’s policy requires 180 days, at the <br />minimum. Any misdemeanor would require a 3-year retention period, and any felony <br />would require a 20-year retention period. <br /> <br />Commissioner Price said in the purpose and scope section, it refers to “portable and <br />mobile,” and asked if Jennifer Galassi could differentiate between the two. <br />Jennifer Galassi said an officer using a personal device is still subject to this policy. <br />Commissioner Price referred to the second paragraph, and said it does not apply to <br />mobile audio-video recordings. <br />Jennifer Galassi said it reads “mobile, audio, or video recordings, interviews or <br />interrogations…” and this is modifying what comes after it. She said it is taking out of this <br />policy interviews, interrogations, recordings that are made within the Sheriff’s office, or taken <br />from an undercover officer, wire taps, or eavesdropping. <br />Commissioner Price said some of the language reads, “should” instead of “shall,” and <br />asked if there is specific reasoning behind this. She read the following as an example: “when <br />using a portable recorder, the assigned member should record his/her name.” She asked if <br />there is a reason the officer is not required to record his/her name. <br />Jennifer Galassi said that is envisioning what it then goes on to discuss. She said she <br />does not know how their particular system will work, and it is envisioned that each unit is going <br />to be assigned to one particular officer, and so the system will be set to an individual, and thus <br />recording a name will be unnecessary. <br />Sheriff Blackwood said the devices will be issued, and the computer index will have the <br />officer’s name on it, and it will be theirs to keep with them all the time. <br />Jennifer Galassi said they have envisioned having additional devices in the event there <br />is a malfunction with one. She said in this scenario, the officer will have to manually assign <br />themselves to the device. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said it sounds like a lot will be learned with experience, and <br />asked if there are any process or evaluation techniques in mind. <br />Jennifer Galassi said it will be a learning curve as things occur. She said issues can be <br />anticipated, but as soon as the officers have the devices, further input and feedback will be <br />gathered. <br />Chair Dorosin said last time this topic was discussed, Sheriff Blackwood said the policy <br />would say that if someone wanted to see a video, they would be permitted to do so; but he <br />said he does not see that allowance in policy 803. <br />Sheriff Blackwood said it is in the General Statute, and if it is not in the policy, it will be <br />added. <br />Chair Dorosin said the State General Statute says a video “may” be disclosed, and he <br />understood that Orange County will make the wording that a video “will” be disclosed to a <br />requesting party contained within the video recording. He said if this is true, he would like to <br />see if reflected in the policy. <br />Jennifer Galassi said the only reference to this point is in 803.5o. <br />Chair Dorosin said he would like to see this specifically added to the Orange County <br />policy.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.