Browse
Search
Minutes 02-20-2018
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 02-20-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
3/9/2018 1:30:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/20/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
3/8/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Board Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 4-a - OWASA Annual Update Presentation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 4-b - FY2018-19 Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Continuation Budget
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 6-a - Greene Tract Conceptual Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 7-a - Orange County Sheriff’s Office Portable Audio-Video Recorders Policy
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 7-b - Update on the Mobile Home Parks Initiative
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-a- Minutes
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-b - Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Amendment #6
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-c - Application for NC Education Lottery Proceeds for CHCCS and Contingent Approval of BA # 6-A Related to CHCCS Capital Project Ordinances
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-d - Approval of 1.0 FTE Time-Limited Erosion Control Officer I Position and Budget Amendment #6-B
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-e - Resolution in Opposition To Offshore Exploration, Drilling Activities and Seismic Blast Activities Off the Coast of North Carolina
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-f - Authorization for NC Recreational Trails Program Grant - Hollow Rock Nature Park
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 02-20-2018 8-g - Letter to Cardinal Innovations in Support of Club Nova’s Request for Capital Funding
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-1 - Information Item - February 6, 2018 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-2 - Information Item - Memorandum - Second Quarter FY2017-18 Financial Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-3 - Information Item – Memorandum - Continued Review of Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments on Signage
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda -02-20-2018 12-4 - Information Item - BOCC Chair Letter Regarding Petitions from February 6, 2018 Regular Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 02-20-2018 Regular Meeting
ORD-2018-008 Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Amendment #6
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
ORD-2018-009 Application for NC Education Lottery Proceeds for CHCCS and Budget Amendment 5-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
ORD-2018-010 Approval of 1.0 FTE Time-Limited Erosion Control Officer I Position and Budget Amendment #6-B
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
RES-2018-012 Resolution in opposition to offshore exploration, drilling and seismic blast activities of the NC coast
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the County has the equipment to do this, and using it to <br />make a roadbed would be a preferable option to other possible approaches, such as asking <br />the railroad. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the walk through needs to take place before he feels <br />comfortable making a recommendation. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if land banking can be defined. <br />Travis Myren said an undefined current use that would require some further action to <br />put it into active use. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if land is land banked does that mean it will be developed, <br />or it is undetermined. <br />Travis Myren said undetermined at this point, and until there is some affirmation action <br />taken by Board of County Commissioners, it will not be developed. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said part of the reason the County kept the east part of the land <br />in Orange County ownership, is because there is a rail line there and a County controlled rail <br />stop may be built at some point. He said the BOCC may want to keep this in mind, and <br />incorporate it into future plans. <br />Commissioner Rich asked if clarification could be provided regarding a “County <br />controlled rail stop”. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said this would be on Orange County property, and the County <br />could put a rail stop there. He said it was a visionary plan, and there is nothing planned. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the “low scenario,” and said he did not understand <br />why the wildlife corridor preserve was only included in this scenario, as opposed to all three. <br />Travis Myren said it is in the low and medium, but it is not continuous in the large. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he applauded the incorporation of a wildlife corridor, but if it <br />is not a corridor, it does not serve the wildlife. He said whether long or narrow, or headwaters <br />modified versus a chunk, is preferable is something he cannot answer, but he would like more <br />information. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not understand why a higher density could not be <br />done anywhere. <br />Travis Myren said the development area by the potential densities would be applied to <br />each size of development area. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not understand why it is assumed in the small <br />scenario that the density is low, as opposed to high density all the way through. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not want to make this land into a “new ghetto” by <br />packing the largest possible amount of people onto the land. He said he is in favor of having <br />mixed use and a variety of housing types, but he does not understand why the density <br />assumptions are being made, especially in the small scenario. <br />Travis Myren said in an unbounded thought exercise, one could see how high the <br />density could go. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said some open space would be required, but he questioned the <br />assumption that one would automatically yield the fewest units, unless the BOCC decides it is <br />going to yield the fewest units. He suggests that a range of units may be a better way to think <br />about it. <br />Travis Myren said he understands Commissioner Jacobs’ comments. <br />Chair Dorosin said he does not understand, and he thought this was a good way to <br />compare the scenarios, because the same metrics is being used for each. He said it does not <br />have to be 20 units, 10 units, and 6 units, but these numbers are benchmarks. He said he is <br />referring to slide 16.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.