Orange County NC Website
23 <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the County has the equipment to do this, and using it to <br />make a roadbed would be a preferable option to other possible approaches, such as asking <br />the railroad. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the walk through needs to take place before he feels <br />comfortable making a recommendation. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if land banking can be defined. <br />Travis Myren said an undefined current use that would require some further action to <br />put it into active use. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if land is land banked does that mean it will be developed, <br />or it is undetermined. <br />Travis Myren said undetermined at this point, and until there is some affirmation action <br />taken by Board of County Commissioners, it will not be developed. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said part of the reason the County kept the east part of the land <br />in Orange County ownership, is because there is a rail line there and a County controlled rail <br />stop may be built at some point. He said the BOCC may want to keep this in mind, and <br />incorporate it into future plans. <br />Commissioner Rich asked if clarification could be provided regarding a “County <br />controlled rail stop”. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said this would be on Orange County property, and the County <br />could put a rail stop there. He said it was a visionary plan, and there is nothing planned. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the “low scenario,” and said he did not understand <br />why the wildlife corridor preserve was only included in this scenario, as opposed to all three. <br />Travis Myren said it is in the low and medium, but it is not continuous in the large. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he applauded the incorporation of a wildlife corridor, but if it <br />is not a corridor, it does not serve the wildlife. He said whether long or narrow, or headwaters <br />modified versus a chunk, is preferable is something he cannot answer, but he would like more <br />information. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not understand why a higher density could not be <br />done anywhere. <br />Travis Myren said the development area by the potential densities would be applied to <br />each size of development area. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not understand why it is assumed in the small <br />scenario that the density is low, as opposed to high density all the way through. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he does not want to make this land into a “new ghetto” by <br />packing the largest possible amount of people onto the land. He said he is in favor of having <br />mixed use and a variety of housing types, but he does not understand why the density <br />assumptions are being made, especially in the small scenario. <br />Travis Myren said in an unbounded thought exercise, one could see how high the <br />density could go. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said some open space would be required, but he questioned the <br />assumption that one would automatically yield the fewest units, unless the BOCC decides it is <br />going to yield the fewest units. He suggests that a range of units may be a better way to think <br />about it. <br />Travis Myren said he understands Commissioner Jacobs’ comments. <br />Chair Dorosin said he does not understand, and he thought this was a good way to <br />compare the scenarios, because the same metrics is being used for each. He said it does not <br />have to be 20 units, 10 units, and 6 units, but these numbers are benchmarks. He said he is <br />referring to slide 16.