Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 080316
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 080316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 12:14:48 PM
Creation date
3/8/2018 11:58:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/3/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 080316
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
111 <br />Perdita Holtz: We are sending out notices next Monday and there’s going to be a public information meeting on the 112 <br />26th of this month. 113 <br /> 114 <br />Craig Benedict: Also, we’ve been in contact with the 166-acre parcel, the present zoning on that now is being 115 <br />marketed so they’re familiar with our process to change the zoning. These zoning amendments would facilitate a 116 <br />better development program. 117 <br /> 118 <br />Perdita Holtz: So the next steps I just mentioned we’re planning on holding the public information meeting on July 119 <br />26th 6:00-7:30 in this room. That meeting will cover the three related topics, which are the joint land use plan 120 <br />amendments that Tom’s going to talk about; these text amendments; and the re-zoning that I’ve just showed you, I 121 <br />think there’s six parcels total. We are doing mailed notices. It’s going to be a combined notice, for both the public 122 <br />information meeting and the August Planning Board meeting to the affected parcels and the property within 1,000 123 <br />feet of those parcels that are proposed for re-zoning and we’re also going to be posting signs in the affected area. 124 <br /> 125 <br />Maxecine Mitchell: That’s good because I just met someone up near the Tanger Mall because they thought they were 126 <br />on the other side of 40/85 and they didn’t attend the information meeting and now their property is commercial but 127 <br />they don’t have water and sewer over there and they didn’t understand all that, so please make sure the people 128 <br />understand that they might want to come and find out what’s going on. 129 <br /> 130 <br />Perdita Holtz: I mentioned that these 3 topics are scheduled for the Planning Board meeting next month on August 131 <br />3rd for recommendation and the quarterly public hearing is scheduled for September 12th. 132 <br /> 133 <br />Tony Blake: Two more questions. I’m reading on the DOT site that they’re planning on widening I-40 from the hill on 134 <br />up; are you aware of that and will they need more land? 135 <br /> 136 <br />Perdita Holtz: I believe they already have right of way for everything. 137 <br /> 138 <br />Tony Blake: Is Hillsborough planning to annex this area? 139 <br /> 140 <br />Perdita Holtz: Not anytime soon because it would have to be a voluntary annexation, the property owner would have 141 <br />to apply for annexation. 142 <br /> 143 <br />Tony Blake: Also one more question; I’ve noticed that Alamance County, Mebane have created a free trade zone, or 144 <br />a foreign trade zone or something like that. Is there a provision in this to do that sort of trade zone if a foreign 145 <br />company wanted to locate here? 146 <br /> 147 <br />Craig Benedict: We have no special provisions within our zoning code for that. That is not a zoning issue; that is a 148 <br />policy and tax issue… For example, if a developer came in and wanted to do an industrial park then that would be 149 <br />part of a tax incentive program. 150 <br /> 151 <br />Kim Piracci: When you were talking about the 20,000 square foot thing and you were going to get rid of that and it 152 <br />was difficult, is that going away? Is it being moved to 40,000? 153 <br /> 154 <br />Perdita Holtz: Well, the way zoning works is that you have legislative decisions where you have by-right things and 155 <br />then you have quasi-judicial decisions. SUPs are quasi-judicial decisions and you haven’t experienced one yet but 156 <br />you will next month. They are fairly complicated and there are a lot of limitations on who can say what and when and 157 <br />things like this. And there are lawyers on all sides. We are suggesting doing away with the SUP requirement for any 158 <br />type of developments on two acre or larger lots. It would still be subject to all of the other criteria that are in the UDO, 159 <br />which is fairly extensive. 160 <br /> 161 <br />Tony Blake: But only in these zones, right? 162 <br /> 163 <br />Perdita Holtz: Right. 164 <br /> 165 <br /> 256
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.