Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 080316
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 080316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 12:14:48 PM
Creation date
3/8/2018 11:58:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/3/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 080316
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
* = PERMITTED USE HILLSBOROUGH EDD <br />USE TYPE EDH-1 EDH-2 EDH-3 EDH-4 EDH-5 <br />Dwelling, single-family *3 <br />Dwelling, two-family * <br />Dwelling, multi-family (6-12 units per acre in the <br />Hillsborough EDD) * * <br />Temporary mobile home (For occupancy during <br />construction of permanent residential unit and for <br />30 days after issuance of Certificate of <br />Occupancy) Temporary Use of a Residential <br />Mobile Home4 <br /> * <br />RETAIL <br />Retail Trade (Sectors 44, 45; excluding Subsector <br />454 Non-store retailers) (Only Hillsborough EDD <br />through Conditional Use District or MPD-CZ) 5 <br /> * * <br />SERVICES <br />Accommodation and Food Service (Sector <br />72) (Eating and drinking establishments are <br />permitted only as accessory use to hotel, or motel <br />or restaurant; Hillsborough EDD only)6 <br /> * * *7 <br />Administrative & Support Services (Sector 561) * * * * * <br />Health Care & Social Assistance (Sector 62) * * * * * <br />3 Staff is suggesting removing single-family residential and two-family (e.g., duplex) uses as permitted uses within the Hillsborough EDD. This is being <br />suggested in order to promote lands within the EDD predominantly for non-residential uses (multi-family uses would be permitted in the indicated districts but <br />subject to the proposed use-specific standards in Section 5.5.10 which limits the scope of the use and requires that, in order to be permitted by-right, they be <br />part of an overall development plan that includes other permitted use(s) as the dominant use. Stand-alone multi-family development could potentially still be <br />permitted within the Hillsborough EDD through either the MPD-CZ process or as a Conditional Use District. <br />4 Staff is suggesting renaming this use type to be consistent with the title used in Section 5.4.4 which contains the standards for this use type. Additionally, <br />staff suggests deleting the use from EDH-3 since only multi-family uses are suggested for EDH-3. <br />5 Staff is suggesting that retail trade be permitted in EDH-4 and EDH-5, subject to the proposed standards in Section 5.6.16 which limit the scope of retail uses <br />allowed by-right and requires they be part of an overall development plan that includes other permitted use(s) as the dominant use. As is currently the <br />situation, retail trade would be permitted as a stand-alone use in the Hillsborough EDD only if a CUD or MPD-CZ is approved. <br />6 Staff is suggesting this language be moved to Section 5.6.17 since the standards section is a more appropriate place for standards. <br />7 Section 5.6.17 contains standards that would permit this use in EDH-5 only if it is limited in scope and part of an overall development plan. <br /> 251
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.