OCPB agenda 080316 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

SUMMARY NOTES 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 JULY 6, 2016 3 ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 4 5 NOTE: A quorum is not required for Ordinance Review Committee meetings. 6 7 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lydia Wegman-At-Large Chapel Hill Township (Chair); Tony Blake, Bingham Township 8 Representative (Vice-Chair); Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Maxecine Mitchell, At-Large Bingham 9 Township; Kim Piracci, At-Large; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; 10 11 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Tom Altieri, Current Planning Supervisor; Perdita Holtz, Planning 12 Systems Supervisor; Ashley Moncado, Special Projects Planner; Meredith Pucci Administrative Assistant; 13 14 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER 15 16 Lydia Wegman called meeting to order. 17 18 **************************** 19 20 AGENDA ITEM 4: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH/ORANGE COUNTY CENTRAL ORANGE COORDINATED AREA LAND USE 21 PLAN AMENDMENT 22 23 To receive information about an upcoming Land Use Plan amendment involving five parcels 24 south of Interstate 40 in the vicinity of Old Highway 86. Amendments are proposed to better 25 promote economic development opportunities in the area and help preserve planned sewer 26 capacities for non-single-family residential uses. 27 28 Presenter: Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor 29 30 Tom Altieri delivered presentation. 31 32 Tony Blake: Is this change being driven by the landowners or by the County or by the town? 33 34 Craig Benedict: There will be an interlocal agreement that will probably refer to these changes that occur here that 35 says, “As long as you redevelop consistent with this joint land use plan then please feel free to use this public water 36 and sewer system.” So the commissioners, probably in September, will be seeing a draft of this interlocal agreement 37 that if the County puts “x” amount of dollars into public water and sewer that they’ll use it for, primarily, non-residential 38 economic development purposes. This is kind of a pre-requisite to that impending public water and sewer extension. 39 40 Lydia Wegman: So they’re not disturbed at losing the mixed residential… 41 42 Craig Benedict: No, because along the frontage of South Churton and Old 86 it’s still there. 43 44 Tom Altieri: So I’ll just add that the agreement that Craig mentioned, that is the last bullet in the PowerPoint here, and 45 it is an important component. The group mentioned “annexation” and the text and zoning amendments that are being 46 made to the UDO, those are within the County’s UDO. In the case of an annexation, a development would occur 47 under the town’s land develop ordinance. So it is that type of an agreement that would outline under what conditions 48 annexation might occur, its timing, if there were a component of, let’s say, this entire Hillsborough economic 49 development district is approximately 500 acres, potentially what percentage of that might be developed for non-50 residential uses versus residential? An agreement could address. So that’s where the County could receive that 51 official handshake from the town on the ratio between residential and non-residential development in the area. 52 53 Attachment 2 Excerpt of Notes 212