Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 080316-2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 080316-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 11:57:08 AM
Creation date
3/8/2018 11:56:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/3/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 080316
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 3: Base Zoning Districts <br /> Section 3.7: Economic Development Districts <br /> <br /> <br />Orange County, North Carolina – Unified Development Ordinance Page 3-55 <br /> <br />MPD-CZ District is approved (see Section 3.8). Additionally, non-residential uses are restricted based on the <br />Watershed Protection Overlay District in which the property is located. Refer to Section 4.2.3 for land use <br />restrictions. Uses Permitted by Right require the approval of a Site Plan as outlined in Section 2.5. <br />2. Development projects unable to meet all Standards required for Site Plan approval may be submitted as a <br />Conditional Use District or as a MPD-CZ (see Section 3.8). <br />3. The impervious surface limit in this district is 50%. Other requirements for impervious surface are located in <br />Sections 4.2.5 and 4.2.6. <br />4. For lots outside of a Watershed Protection Overlay District (see Section 4.2), the minimum usable lot area for lots <br />that utilize ground absorption wastewater systems shall be 30,000 square feet for parcels between 40,000 square <br />feet and 1.99 acres in size; zoning lots two acres and greater in size shall have a minimum usable lot area of at <br />least 40,000 square feet. <br />5. Development within the zoning district shall be subject to all applicable use standards detailed in Article 5 and all <br />applicable development standards detailed in Article 6 of this Ordinance. See Sections 6.2.5 and 6.2.6 if more than <br />one principal use or principal structure is proposed on a non-residential zoning lot. <br />6. Residential uses are not permitted in this district. <br />7. A structure or structures exceeding 20,000 square feet cumulatively on one zoning lot shall only be approved <br />through a Special Use Permit, Class A process regardless of use. <br />8. All zoning lots greater than 2.0 acres shall only be approved through a Special Use Permit, Class A process <br />regardless of use.2 <br />9. Any nonresidential use within two hundred feet of a residential subdivision a lot smaller than 2 acres in size with an <br />existing dwelling unit shall require a Special Use Permit, Class A.3 <br />10. Direct driveway access to an arterial or major collector shall be prohibited. A frontage or service road shall be <br />dedicated and constructed to provide access along all arterials or major collectors. Direct driveway access to an <br />arterial or major collector shall be limited to shared driveways, limited access streets, or marginal access streets <br />except where such a driveway and/or street would a) cross a stream and require a no-rise certification from the NC <br />Department of Public Safety National Flood Insurance Program or, b) be located on a slope greater than 15%, or c) <br />disturb natural areas as identified in the Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County, NC.4 <br />11. No drive through facilities may be constructed in this district. <br />12. A justification for any deviation to development standards must state a public benefit or purpose. <br />13. All parcels shall provide for interconnectivity between parking areas if determined necessary by Planning staff. <br />14. Subdivisions proposing private roads are subject to larger setbacks and minimum lot sizes than those listed in the <br />Dimensional and Ratio Standards. Refer to Section 7.8.4 for additional requirements. Refer to Section 7.8.5 for <br />private road standards. <br />15. Proposed subdivisions shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 2.16. <br />16. See Section 5.3.2(C) for standards for uses requiring a Class A Special Use Permit. <br /> <br /> <br />2 In order to promote economic development opportunities, Staff is suggesting deletion of standards 7 and 8 which <br />require a Class A Special Use Permit for projects above a certain size. Staff notes that standard #9 is suggested to <br />remain in place; this standard requires a Class A Special Use Permit for any nonresidential use located within 200- <br />feet of an existing residential use on a smaller lot size. Typically, SUPs are used to require that a specific type of <br />use (e.g., utility substations or wireless communication towers) be required to prove, in a quasi-judicial setting, <br />that the use will meet the standards found in Section 5.3.2 of the UDO. It is unusual to require any use that <br />reaches a certain size or that is located on a lot smaller or larger than a certain size be required to obtain a SUP. <br />3 The Attorney’s office has advised that the term “residential subdivision” is vague and should be revised to a more <br />definitive standard, particularly since the idea in #9 is proposed to be applied to EDH-3. The lot size suggested (2 <br />acres or smaller) is being suggested because the vast majority of existing residential uses near EDH zoning <br />boundaries are located on lots smaller than 2 acres in size. It should also be noted that Section 6.8.12(C) requires <br />additional landscaped buffers at the perimeter of the EDDs and adjacent to interstates and certain roadways. <br />4 Staff is suggesting revised language because existing language provides no by-right flexibility to the requirement <br />for frontage (or backage) roads in cases where site features might warrant flexibility in the requirement. The <br />terms limited access street and marginal access street are existing terms and definitions in the UDO. Additionally, <br />staff will bring an Amendment Outline Form to the BOCC after the summer break to receive authorization to <br />develop an Access Management Plan for Hillsborough EDD. Section 2.5.3(V) of the UDO requires that site plan be <br />in compliance with adopted access management plans; having an adopted access management plan will allow staff <br />to require that parcels reserve access easements for future connectivity.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.