Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 050416
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 050416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 11:55:50 AM
Creation date
3/8/2018 11:48:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 050416
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tony Blake: If you can. A lot of people live within walking distance; the least we could do is provide a good, raised 108 <br />platform sort of transit. 109 <br /> 110 <br />Lisa Stuckey: What is raised platform? 111 <br /> 112 <br />Tony Blake: The big slam against buses versus light rail is light rail you board and you walk directly from the platform 113 <br />onto the platform without steps. But BRT actually has the ability to pull a bus in at a raised platform and where you 114 <br />are walking directly onto the bus, the same way you would walk onto a light rail train. And it’s being deployed and it’s 115 <br />a lot cheaper than light rail and more flexible. And the travel lane down Martin Luther King will actually be able to be 116 <br />used for emergency vehicles as well. 117 <br /> 118 <br />Ashely Moncado continued with the presentation 119 <br /> 120 <br />James Lea: What would that do to the property owners? Would that raise their taxes? 121 <br /> 122 <br />Craig Benedict: No. The property taxes are based on the properties of a similar zoning category sell over time. So, 123 <br />putting even sewer on a piece of property eventually would raise the value of it but changing the uses would not 124 <br />automatically, until somebody determines that this new use list is better and therefore more valuable but, we’re a 125 <br />couple years from where that would ever matriculate into higher values. 126 <br /> 127 <br />Lisa Stuckey: It leads to the potential of higher value, so higher taxes. 128 <br /> 129 <br />Paul Guthrie: It could potentially. Property is less and less areas available for residential, for example, outside of that 130 <br />district if someone wanted to sell their house in that they would have, potentially, a sale of their house that would 131 <br />raise as assess valuation in the next re-evaluation. 132 <br /> 133 <br />Craig Benedict: We have examined which districts have residential. If they sell their residential property for office 134 <br />research manufacturing and they get more money for it at some point in the future, they’d love that. 135 <br /> 136 <br />Paul Guthrie: But you can’t keep them from selling it for another residential person. 137 <br /> 138 <br />Craig Benedict: Probably not. 139 <br /> 140 <br />Paul Guthrie: This is a far out thing, but we’re still in the area. I spent a good part of the afternoon reading about this 141 <br />other thing, the Supreme Court case, and these are the kinds of things you start getting trouble with down the road. 142 <br /> 143 <br />Craig Benedict: One last thing about that, we addressed this in the Buckhorn EBB area. We asked the people if they 144 <br />would like the zoning rollback to residential one that would allow the house to be reconstructed and burned down or 145 <br />would you like it to remain Buckhorn District 2 that has higher value if you ever sell it, it was resounding to leave it 146 <br />EDB-2. 147 <br /> 148 <br />Michael Harvey: One more thought in question when I read this. There’s a demand right now. There’s a lack of wet 149 <br />lab space in the area and this talks about laboratories, not limited laboratories, prototype production, general facilities 150 <br />but, wet labs sometimes have some pretty onerous stuff going on in them. Is there something that you would put in 151 <br />here to protect that or restrict that or change that? Basically, this is something I can see where somebody would want 152 <br />to come in and put in a wet lab and this thing they’re dealing with some kind of biological agent or something like that 153 <br />and people go crazy, but it’s permitted by right and so I’m just trying to air on the side of caution here. 154 <br /> 155 <br />Craig Benedict: Two answers in there. There might be room to add something here. One is we tried not to legislate 156 <br />water consumption, even though there are some provisions in some of our economic development zones that talk 157 <br />about it, but it doesn’t say that if you use over one galloon per square foot we’re not going to allow you. So that’s one 158 <br />element we try not to legislate uses by the water they use but, admittedly in all of our economic development zones 159 <br />we have limitations on water use because there’s just not a lot of water. In Hillsborough there’s some water limitation, 160 <br />also in Eno. The bigger restriction is the sewer outfall that comes from it, that’s where the restriction is. So with the 161 <br /> 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.