OCPB agenda 030216 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

5 should be a broader outreach meeting beyond 1,000 feet. So that can occur, especially when it’s government 212 initiated. 213 214 Tony Blake: Yeah, the SUP case I was thinking of is the guy who builds the subdivision with 10 or 15 houses and a 215 runway and everybody’s got their own little hangar; is that a public airport? Is that a private airport? And then if it’s a 216 SUP and you only have to notify people within 1,000 feet that landing and taking off could extend quite a bit beyond 217 there. That’s the just of my concern. 218 219 Lydia Wegman: Okay, great, thank you. 220 221 Patricia Roberts: Is there any airport planned? 222 223 Craig Benedict: No, there are no airports planned. We are in the process of updating our airport regulations. Some of 224 our outreach meetings were occurring around the holidays so it was decided to move it to a less busy time to 225 evaluate the new regulations. The best time to update your regulations is when there are no proposals out there. So 226 we will begin again, we’re going to speak with the commissioners in a work session about the process and the 227 parameters of some of the updates and it probably will not come back until later this year. 228 229 Lisa Stuckey: I think all the schools I dealt with were in the cities of Chapel Hill or Carrboro, their jurisdictions. But 230 typically, we went way beyond 1,000 feet and there was a community meeting and there was a lot of use of various 231 media to get the word out because you don’t want to build a big thing like that and then have all these people angry 232 later. So you know what to incorporate. 233 234 Tony Blake: Yeah, and it may be something that’s already been considered and non-issue. I just couldn’t find it 235 anywhere and I couldn’t find anywhere where this could be superseded by a SUP. 236 237 Lydia Wegman: And the school would be a governmental use, wouldn’t it? 238 239 Perdita Holtz: Schools actually come under a different section, but there’s outreach you have to do. 240 241 242 AGENDA ITEM 9: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENT - To make a 243 recommendation to the BOCC on government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO 244 regarding temporary healthcare structures and other custodial care housing options. This 245 item is scheduled for the February 18, 2016 quarterly public hearing. 246 247 PRESENTER: Ashley Moncado, Special Projects Planner 248 249 Ashley Moncado reviewed abstract 250 251 Patricia Roberts: I was having kind of a hard time visualizing what this would look like. Does anybody have an 252 example? 253 254 Ashley Moncado: At one point we did have a little flyer, unfortunately it’s not included in your packet tonight. It’s a 255 mobile unit, so if you can picture a single wide manufactured home, even smaller than that. A temporary health care 256 structure originally is only about 300 square feet. It’s a mobile unit so it’s basically a room with a bathroom. It can go 257 on any lot where an existing single family home would be permitted. Your only issue with neighborhoods, they are 258 permitted at the county level, but if there’s covenants or restrictions then they trump the Session Law. 259 260 Patricia Roberts: I see 1,000 square feet everywhere here except for the table, on the table it said it can’t exceed 300 261 square feet. 262 263 Ashley Moncado: I think that is just referencing a temporary health care structure, which this is something from a 264 previous meeting where they wanted to know what other options there are out there for providing care to family 265 9 9