Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 030216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
OCPB agenda 030216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 11:45:03 AM
Creation date
3/8/2018 11:41:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/2/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 030216
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br />Perdita Holtz: The planning department is actually involved in the mailed notifications and we do a certificate of 104 <br />mailing that you’ve seen in amendment packets. Whichever staff person is in charge of the mailing signs it to certify 105 <br />it was done as stated. 106 <br /> 107 <br />Paul Guthrie: We don’t need to do any language in here to make sure that happens? 108 <br /> 109 <br />Perdita Holtz: Correct…. In the case of governmental uses, which those are most likely going to be your fire 110 <br />departments, we are asking that whoever is heading up that effort for the fire department would give us a statement 111 <br />that certifies that they mailed it when they said they mailed it. 112 <br /> 113 <br />Paul Guthrie: But you’re going to monitor private individuals who are asking for an action that are required to mail? 114 <br /> 115 <br />Perdita Holtz: Yes, we actually do the mailing. The planning department does the mailing; they just pay for them. 116 <br /> 117 <br />Tony Blake: But you guys make a copy of everything that’s sent out anyways, right? 118 <br /> 119 <br />Perdita Holtz: Well, we have the mailing list of property owners and the actual letter that goes into the file. 120 <br /> 121 <br />Lydia Wegman: Other comments? 122 <br /> 123 <br />Tony Blake: I had one from people that have called me, my phones lit up when they heard a story about the airport, 124 <br />and a couple of people were thinking that a broader notification should go out, in light of an airport. Or something that 125 <br />has significant impacts like noise or what have you. So I wanted to float that idea and I wanted to get that in the 126 <br />minutes so that the County Commissioners read it as well. 127 <br /> 128 <br />Andrea Rohrbacher: I can’t remember what the outcome of this point was, it seems that at one meeting we discussed 129 <br />putting some sort of lettering on the outside of the envelope to indicate that it had to do with development so that 130 <br />people wouldn’t think that it was junk mail. 131 <br /> 132 <br />Perdita Holtz: Right, and that is in there under the public hearing portion that it’s going to say, “Notice of Hearing” on 133 <br />the outside of the envelope. 134 <br /> 135 <br />Lydia Wegman: Other comments, questions? 136 <br /> 137 <br />Paul Guthrie: I have one other. Someone who doesn’t receive notice but hears about the project, will they just come 138 <br />directly to the planning organization and say, “Hey, we heard this was going on. What’s going on?” 139 <br /> 140 <br />Perdita Holtz: Yes, because there’s still the sign that’s posted on the property so anybody seeing that sign could 141 <br />contact us. 142 <br /> 143 <br />Paul Guthrie: Because there are certain things that affect well beyond 1000 feet or 500 feet. So you’re able to 144 <br />accommodate that without any problems? You don’t need anything in the code to help you do that? 145 <br /> 146 <br />Perdita Holtz: No. 147 <br /> 148 <br />Paul Guthrie: Okay. Thanks. 149 <br /> 150 <br />Craig Benedict: Perdita, can you explain to the Board the new process a little bit that’s going to be occurring in this 151 <br />amendment that they’re making recommendation and consistency before the public hearing? 152 <br /> 153 <br />Perdita Holtz: I hit on it earlier tonight, it’s the first time that we’re doing this new process and tonight is making a 154 <br />recommendation in time for the February 18th quarterly public hearing so, it’s the same types of actions, they’re just 155 <br />occurring in a different order than they used to. 156 <br /> 157 <br /> 7 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.