Orange County NC Website
SUMMARY NOTES 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 AUGUST 5, 2015 3 <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 4 5 <br />NOTE: A quorum is not required for Ordinance Review Committee meetings. 6 7 MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Hallenbeck (Chair), Cheeks Township Representative; Lydia Wegman-At-Large Chapel 8 <br />Hill Township (Vice Chair); Tony Blake, Bingham Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill 9 <br />Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; Laura Nicholson, Eno Township Representative; 10 <br />Herman Staats, At-Large, Cedar Grove Township; James Lea, Cedar Grove Township Representative; 11 <br /> 12 STAFF PRESENT: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator; Ashley 13 <br />Moncado, Special Projects Planner; 14 15 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER 16 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS 17 <br />PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS REVISIONS 18 <br />To continue review and comment upon proposed amendments to the UDO to revise the 19 <br />public hearing process. 20 <br /> 21 Presenter: Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator 22 23 <br />Perdita Holtz: Reviewed abstract and presentation. 24 <br /> 25 <br />James Lea: When you say generally are you speaking of Section 2.3.7, is that the word you are talking about? 26 <br /> 27 <br />Perdita Holtz: Yes, we are suggesting that A, B, and C be deleted, and this is what I would like your input on, but if 28 <br />they are not to be deleted then it would need to be amended as shown. We are suggesting any amendment to the 29 <br />comprehensive plan can be heard at any of the four quarterly public hearings. How does the ORC feel about that? 30 <br /> 31 <br />Lydia Wegman: Where does it say four times a year? 32 <br /> 33 <br />Perdita Holtz: The language would say proposed amendments shall be considered at the quarterly public hearings. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Lydia Wegman: I think that makes sense 36 <br /> 37 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: It sounds good to me. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Tony Blake: I am not opposed to the intent; I’m just trying to think of things that could go wrong. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: We have also had concerns in the past that the county moves too slowly. Making this four times a 42 <br />year is a good deal. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Perdita Holtz: Ok, it sounds like you are good with changing that. 45 <br /> 46 <br />Perdita Holtz continued presentation. 47 <br /> 48 <br />Perdita Holtz: Would it be acceptable to combine the Planning Board meeting notice and the quarterly public hearing 49 <br />notice into one? Or should we stick to having two separate ones? 50 <br /> 51 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: You schedule the two at the same time? 52 <br /> 53 <br />Perdita Holtz: Yes, we schedule both at the same time. 54 <br />5