Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 090215
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 090215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 4:08:53 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 4:06:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 090215
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Comment – The BOCC is now scheduled to receive the Planning Board <br />recommendation at its November 5, 2015 regular meeting. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: This item was presented at the May 26, 2015 Quarterly Public Hearing. Agenda <br />materials from this meeting can be viewed at: http://www.orangecountync.gov/150526QPHKC.pdf. <br /> <br />As articulated at the public hearing, the proposed project is a village style development with <br />approximately 34 dwelling units and involves the preservation of the majority of the property as <br />vegetative open space and farm area (i.e. pasture and crop production). The residential portion <br />of the project would occupy approximately 22 acres of the parcel with another 5 to 8 acres being <br />used to support the proposed septic system. The remaining acreage would be preserved as <br />farmland and dedicated open space. <br /> <br />During the public hearing the following comments were made: <br /> <br />1. There was general support for the project. <br />2. A BOCC member requested additional information on the ownership mechanism <br />proposed by the applicant, expressing concern(s) over how residents will own their <br />individual housing units and surrounding property. <br />STAFF COMMENT: Please refer to Attachment 2 of the abstract for the <br />applicant’s response. <br />3. A BOCC member asked for clarification on the imposition of conditions. <br />STAFF COMMENT: As detailed in the public hearing abstract, mutually agreed <br />upon conditions can be imposed as part this process only if they address: <br />i. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, <br />ii. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways and access points, parking, <br />pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas, <br />etc.) and/or <br />iii. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may <br />propose. <br />4. A BOCC member asked staff to clarify proposed and allowable density. <br />STAFF COMMENT: The property is located within the Rural Residential (R-1) <br />general use zoning district and the Upper Eno Protected Watershed Protection <br />Overlay District allowing for a density of 1 dwelling unit for every 40,000 sq. ft. <br />(0.92 acres) of property. <br />The property is also located within the 20 Year Transition Area as denoted on the <br />Future Land Use Map and is designated as being Urban on the Growth <br />Management System Map indicating urban densities are permitted. <br />This could result in a total of 112 dwelling units being developed on the property <br />based purely on the size of the parcel and not taking other factors into <br />consideration (i.e. adequate soils for septic, road access, permitting process, <br />presence of stream and other environmental features, etc.). <br />If approved the project would only allow for 1 dwelling unit for approximately every <br />3.2 acres of property and 34 dwelling units. <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.