Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 080515
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 080515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 4:05:36 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 4:05:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 080515
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOTION made by Lisa Stuckey to recommend the special use permit for approval and all eleven 150 <br />recommended conditions. Laura Nicholson seconded. 151 VOTE: Unanimous 152 <br /> 153 <br />AGENDA ITEM 9: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT (CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT): To begin review of a 154 <br />request to rezone 112 acres of property from Rural Residential (R-1), Upper Eno 155 <br />Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District to Master Planned Development 156 <br />Conditional Zoning (MPD-CZ), Upper Eno Protected Watershed Protection 157 <br />Overlay District in order to allow for the development of Hart’s Mill Village within 158 <br />the Cheeks Township. This item was heard at the May 26, 2015 quarterly public 159 <br />hearing. 160 <br /> 161 <br /> Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 162 <br /> 163 <br />Michael Harvey: Reviewed abstract. 164 <br /> 165 <br />Paul Guthrie: Is it a common sewage disposal system or individual? 166 <br /> 167 <br />Michael Harvey: Common septic system with about 6 acres devoted to supporting a septic area. 168 <br /> 169 <br />Paul Guthrie: They need to carefully structure the ownership model as to who is responsible. 170 <br /> 171 <br />Buddy Hartley: If this is done like condominiums, the sewer is basically handled by the state, permitted, it 172 <br />could be checked, they should have an association which pays homeowners dues that takes care of the 173 <br />streets, etc. 174 <br /> 175 <br />Michael Harvey: I am asking you for questions or comments in the next couple of weeks, email me by July 176 <br />17, 2015. This will come back to you. My goal is to bring this back at the September meeting. 177 <br /> 178 <br />Lydia Wegman: Is there any different impact when you have however many people living there in 34 units 179 <br />and running a farm. 180 <br /> 181 <br />Michael Harvey: They enjoy the same rights as any 112 acre parcel of property owner that lives on the 182 <br />property. If they are engaging in an activity otherwise, they would have to go through the appropriate 183 <br />review and approval process. 184 <br /> 185 <br />Maxecine Mitchell: I want to encourage us to not to knock against it. It is really neat. I was hearing all the 186 <br />concerns. I was thinking about neighborhoods. Let’s embrace them and help them out. 187 <br /> 188 <br />Tony Blake: I agree, but this is a hybrid between a condominium and farm. There are different rules. 189 <br /> 190 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Everyone is for this. Whatever they do, since they are creating their own zoning district, 191 <br />so whatever they do, they have to go back and modify that. 192 <br /> 193 <br />Buddy Hartley: Would there be any private security? 194 <br /> 195 <br />Michael Harvey: Here is my list of additional questions for the applicant. You would like to see the 196 <br />promotional materials and have a better understanding of how they are marketing this vision, this board 197 <br />would like the applicant to consider the future and additional uses they may want to include, request for a 198 <br />12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.