OCPB agenda 070115 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

requiring connection with adjoining subdivisions as this could create traffic concerns for adjacent neighborhoods. 7. A BOCC member asked the applicant to provide additional detail on the proposed 6 inch water line serving the project and if the line would be adequate to support water for both consumption and firefighting capabilities. 8. Several BOCC members asked for clarification on the proposed septic system for the project. 9. Planning staff indicated the applicant was asked to provide additional detail on proposed landscaping in and around individual residential structures. As of this date we are awaiting a response from the applicant on the various questions posed at the public hearing. Planning Director’s Analysis: The Planning Director has reviewed the proposal and is supportive of the project. We are awaiting answers to these aforementioned questions, however, before we make a formal recommendation. Staff has provided draft Statement of Consistency in Attachment 2 and an ordinance approving the rezoning request, and establishing development conditions/criteria, in Attachment 3 to aid Board members in their review. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who have determined that the approval or denial of the request would not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. Costs associated with advertising, including the public hearing notice and mailings, were paid by the applicant in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule. Costs associated with permitting development of the project shall be paid by the applicant in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule (i.e. erosion control, stormwater management, building, zoning, etc.). RECOMMENDATION(S): The Planning Director recommends the Board continue review the project and request any additional information deemed necessary to aid them in being able to make a recommendation to the BOCC. 89