Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 070115
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 070115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 4:04:35 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 4:00:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 070115
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There shall be no business or other occupied office located on the property and vehicular access is <br />off of White Cross Road and shall be restricted via a 24 foot access gate. <br /> <br />Agenda materials from the Quarterly Public Hearing can be viewed at: <br />http://www.orangecountync.gov/150526QPHKC.pdf <br /> <br />During the hearing, the following comments/questions were posed concerning the application: <br />• Several BOCC members requested clarification on the proposed land use buffer <br />modifications: <br />RESPONSE: The applicant indicated there would be an additional 15 feet of buffer <br />width along the northern property line. This would include the preservation of <br />approximately 20 ft. of the exterior of the proposed land use buffer. <br />• A Planning Board member asked the applicant to clarify testimony related to the fiscal <br />impact analysis. Specifically to review the methodology used in determining how the <br />project would ‘maintain or enhance’ the value of contiguous property. <br />RESPONSE: Mr. Thomas Hester outlined the methodology and indicated his <br />report even provided an assessment of existing property values near a previously <br />constructed solar facility within Orange County. <br />Mr. Hester indicated it was his professional opinion there was no evidence <br />indicating the development of this facility would impact adjacent property value. <br />• There were general comments from the BOCC and Planning Board members over the <br />construction of solar facilities in Orange County. <br />It should be noted no one from the public spoke at the hearing. <br /> <br />Analysis: As required under Section 2.7.4 of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to: <br />‘cause an analysis to be made of the application’ and pass that analysis on to the reviewing <br />body. In analyzing this request, the Planning Director offers the following: <br />a. Application submittal requirements detailed within Section 2.7 of the UDO have been <br />satisfied. <br />b. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with respect to landscaping and buffering <br />requirements as detailed within Section 6.8 of the UDO. <br />c. Staff has made the determination that a formal Environmental Impact Statement would <br />not be required per Section 6.16 of the UDO. <br />d. The applicant has complied with specific development standards associated with the <br />development of a solar facility as detailed within Section 5.9.6 (C) of the UDO. <br />e. Comments received from various County agencies (i.e. Sheriff, Fire Marshal, DEAPR, <br />Orange County Health) indicate there are no concerns associated with the request. <br />Please refer to Attachment 3 of the May 26, 2015 Quarterly Public Hearing packet for <br />additional information. <br />f. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the various goals outlined within the <br />Comprehensive Plan concerning development, including: <br />61
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.