Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Lydia Wegman: I realize that I will just note this requirement to vote on consistency is an empty requirement because 1 <br />as you say Pete, there’s always a lot of inconsistent things in the comprehensive plan and you could find something to 2 <br />support almost any position in the plan. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Paul Guthrie: Are you going to call the vote. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Vote 10 to 2 (Paul Guthrie/ ) 7 <br /> 8 <br />Paul Guthrie: I didn’t like it. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Motion to approve the amendment as in the packet UDO amendments. 11 <br /> 12 <br />James Lea: What page is that on? 13 <br /> 14 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: 73 attachement 3. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Motion by Buddy Hartley. Seconded by Bryant Warren. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: This is the section in red we discussed where it says the submittal requirements and so forth. This 19 <br />document is very much driven by the state law. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Ashley Moncado: Yes 22 <br /> 23 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: 24 <br /> 25 <br />Vote: 9 to 3 (Lydia Wegman, Lisa Stuckey and Paul Guthrie) 26 <br /> 27 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Paul would you like to say anything. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Paul Guthrie: Bad law, we can deal with the issue without it. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Lisa Stuckey: I’m voting no simply because I don’t think we have all the facts. This is something worth asking the 32 <br />attorney whether it could be made less restrictive to include nonrelatives to be in compliance with other areas of our 33 <br />UDO to allow husband and wife to be in there together so I just feel like I would rather let the attorney guide us, 34 <br />something for county commissioners to ask the attorney. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Lydia Wegman: I agree with Lisa. I’m concerned about approving just this piece without having the other pieces. We’ve 37 <br />talked about going forward with it so it’s clear that we are presenting a whole package of options to people who are 38 <br />facing this situation. We may need to follow up on Lisa’s suggestion and we many need to approve this but I would like 39 <br />to see if there is a way at the same time to approve something that is broader and meets the needs of many more 40 <br />people in the county. 41 <br /> 42 <br />AGENDA ITEM 11: ADJOURNMENT 43 <br /> 44 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Ok. Very good. That was the last item on our agenda. I’ll entertain a motion to adjourn. 45 <br /> 46 <br />Motion to adjourn made by Bryant Warren. Seconded by Laura Nicholson 47 <br />24