OCPB agenda 070115 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Laura Nicholson: I withdraw my amendment request however this is a solution without a problem. It’s a unaffordable 1 ridiculous thing but I am all for complying with state regulations. 2 3 Tony: 1 question for Mike, this temporary structure does this count against your impervious surface? 4 5 Michael Harvey: Everything counts against your impervious surface if it meets the definition. 6 7 Paul Guthrie: Between the septic laws and the impervious surface, I think there can be lots of decisions made on the 8 process. 9 10 Lydia Wegman: Craig & Michael you mentioned co-housing and it sounds like some discussion is going on, is that 11 something this could incude addressing this problem that we’re talking about? 12 13 Craig Benedict: Yes. I think this could go true we have new initiatives about affordable housing about small housing but 14 we’ve been trying to describe these new housing opportunities out there. Are they mobile homes, are they RVs, are 15 they micro houses, we will be presenting to the commissioners probably in September of this year. These other type of 16 housing options would address bringing the parents back in the house. We’re into that process, we would expect 17 getting a green light to address some of those issues in September or October and bringing forward later this year. 18 19 Lydia Wegman: And would that kind of thing come to the planning board fi the commissioners said go? 20 21 Craig Benedict: Yes, definitely. 22 23 Lydia Wegman: Thank you. 24 25 Pete Hallenbeck: We have a statement of consistency to vote on and it says this isn’t against what’s in the 26 comprehensive plan. It addresses a .25% improvement on that plan. We’ll need a motion to vote on that and then vote 27 on the specific amendment items here. We’ll make a recommendation to the BOCC on the statement of consistency 28 that yes we think it is consistent. 29 30 MOTION made by: Buddy Hartley. Seconded by: Bryant Warren 31 32 Lydia Wegman: Housing goal #2 – Housing that is useable by as many people as possible regardless of age, ability or 33 circumstances but this is only useable by one person 34 35 Tony Blake: 1 income 36 37 Laura Nicholson: it also says affordable housing earlier in that. 38 39 Lydia Wegman: I don’t think it’s consistent so ia m going to vote No. 40 41 Pete Hallenbeck: The comprehensive plan and the UDO are often in conflict with each other. 42 43 Lydia Wegman: I know that. 44 45 Pete Hallenbeck: We want affordable housing and we want sidewalks. 46 47 23