Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 070115
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 070115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 4:04:35 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 4:00:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 070115
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lisa Stuckey: If I want to use one of these things, then I am restructured. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: This is a state issue. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Michael Harvey: We are doing this amendment because the state recognizes this specific unit. Previously, our 5 <br />ordinance allowed for a mobile home to be on a property every year. We had to recognize it because the state said we 6 <br />had to allow this and it was a compromise to what was really and unreasonable process to allow for a temporary 7 <br />custodial mobile home that imposes an additional cost. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Ashley Moncado: We have had previous staff discussion about aging in place, having an accessory dwelling unit to live 10 <br />together in a dwelling unit, etc. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: You are putting this in because there is a person with healthcare issues that you want to take care of 13 <br />on your property. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Lisa Stuckey: Could we recommend losing that limitation? 16 <br /> 17 <br />Ashley Moncado: I would feel that if you are not more restrictive statute we could recommend it tonight and present it 18 <br />to the BOCC. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Laura Rohrbacher: I have an issue regarding aging in place and if you have two aging parents, the temporary health 21 <br />care structure does not address that. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: If we are going to get rid of the relationship thing. I would like to put something in there that says you 24 <br />care for the people without charging them. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Tony Blake: How does this differ from a trailer? This sounds like a high end solution for people. This sounds to be a 27 <br />specific company to corner the market on a high end solution and exclude everything else. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: The state’s going to do it. Did you want to take the funny thing being rammed down our throat or 30 <br />take the rest of the UDO and try to solve the problem? If we are getting rid of the family thing, put something in there 31 <br />that says don’t charge. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Ashley Moncado: Reconstructed NC State building codes, a manufactured or mobile home would not qualify as a 34 <br />temporary health care structure. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Tony Blake: So there’s a different building code for a temporary health care structure? 37 <br /> 38 <br />Ashley Moncado: Temporary health care structures are to be built to NC State building code as the same as a modular 39 <br />unit so there are standards that are similar to a modular unit. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Tony Blake: Trying to prevent people from putting mobile in? 42 <br /> 43 <br />Ashley: Possibly, but we still have the option of that. You can go through the option of having a temporary mobile home 44 <br />brought on a piece of property. 45 <br /> 46 <br />Tony Blake: this seems to be almost legislation for a specific company to try and corner the market on a high end 47 <br />solution and exclude everything else. That’s what worries me and I think that’s what worries commissioner Dorosin as 48 <br />well. 49 <br />20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.